ProTTT: Learning to Learn Semantic User Memory with Test-Time Training
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Personalization requires language models to capture user-specific knowledge from a growing user history. Existing context-based approaches incur increasing inference costs as user history accumulates and rely on separate retrieval or summarization stages, while parametric-based approaches often require reconstructing user representations when new user data is added. We introduce ProTTT, a profile-supervised meta-learning framework for learning semantic user memory. The memory construction starts from a shared initialization and is updated for each user through test-time training on user history, allowing it to evolve continuously as the history grows. However, since test-time training alone does not explicitly encourage the memory to capture semantic user knowledge necessary for personalization, we learn this shared initialization using textual user profiles as supervision, so that test-time training on user history captures semantic knowledge more effectively. ProTTT consistently outperforms both full history ICL and all parametric baselines across diverse benchmarks, while substantially reducing inference cost by compressing user history into a lightweight parameterized memory. Our analysis also shows that profile supervision is a reliable objective for learning semantic user knowledge and that the resulting memory can track and retain evolving user preferences, while remaining robust across different history sizes. Overall, we demonstrate the effectiveness of test-time training for personalization and establish ProTTT as a baseline for continuously evolving user memory.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 16 of its 22 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 26 Sep 2026.
Builds on
16 of 22 references.
References · 16
- 2023LaMP: When Large Language Models Meet Personalizationcited by 437
- 2024Learning to (Learn at Test Time): RNNs with Expressive Hidden Statescited by 355
- 2024Titans: Learning to Memorize at Test Timecited by 328
- 2025Know Me, Respond to Me: Benchmarking LLMs for Dynamic User Profiling and Personalized Responses at Scalecited by 178
- 2024Optimization Methods for Personalizing Large Language Models through Retrieval Augmentationcited by 99
- 2023Pearl: Personalizing Large Language Model Writing Assistants with Generation-Calibrated Retrieverscited by 92
- 2024User-LLM: Efficient LLM Contextualization with User Embeddingscited by 76
- 2024Personalized Pieces: Efficient Personalized Large Language Models through Collaborative Effortscited by 74
- 2025End-to-End Test-Time Training for Long Contextcited by 62
- 2023Integrating Summarization and Retrieval for Enhanced Personalization via Large Language Modelscited by 45
- 2024LLMs + Persona-Plug = Personalized LLMscited by 32
- 2025PRIME: Large Language Model Personalization with Cognitive Dual-Memory and Personalized Thought Processcited by 18
4 more
- 2025Instant Personalized Large Language Model Adaptation via Hypernetworkcited by 18
- 2026AlpsBench: An LLM Personalization Benchmark for Real-Dialogue Memorization and Preference Alignmentcited by 10
- 2026GradMem: Learning to Write Context into Memory with Test-Time Gradient Descentcited by 9
- 2026Learning to Retrieve User History and Generate User Profiles for Personalized Persuasiveness Predictioncited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.