SAMBAR: Selective Anchoring via Method of Multipliers for Balanced Knowledge Acquisition and Retention in Vision-Language-Action Models
On the map: Vision-language-action models → Reinforcement learning and post-training also fits: VLA architectures and generalization
Abstract (arXiv)
Vision-Language-Action (VLA) models leverage large-scale pretraining to ultimately achieve generalist manipulation. Deployed VLA policies must support continual learning to acquire new tasks over time. Teaching a VLA a new task generally requires finetuning it on demonstrations of that task. However, naively finetuning on downstream tasks causes the policy to forget earlier tasks and degrades generalist capabilities. This failure is known as catastrophic forgetting. Most continual learning methods counter it by replaying data from earlier tasks. However, the old task demonstrations are not always readily available. In this paper, we introduce SAMBAR, a continual learning algorithm that prevents catastrophic forgetting during VLA finetuning without requiring access to the demonstrations of any previously learned task. We propose to cast continual learning as a constrained optimization problem and solve it with the method of multipliers. In our approach, the method of multipliers drives the policy to learn the new task without the model parameters drifting far away from their previous values. In contrast to a standard regularization penalty, the method of multipliers raises the penalty as the constraint violation accumulates by using a dual variable. We also selectively anchor the parameters critical to previous tasks to preserve past knowledge, leaving other parameters free for new task acquisition. The combination of dual variable and selective anchoring, therefore, balances knowledge acquisition with knowledge retention. We evaluate our method, SAMBAR, on the LIBERO simulation benchmark and on hardware. When sequentially finetuning on a VLA, every replay-free baseline we compare against completely forgets the first task it learned, whereas SAMBAR retains every task it has learned.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Reinforcement learning and post-training, one of 13 directions in Vision-language-action models. Builds on 30 of its 36 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 26 Sep 2026.
Builds on
30 of 36 references.
Closest ancestors · 7
Same direction, newest first
- 2026Can Vision-Language-Action Models Learn from Real-World Data Continually without Forgetting?26 May
- 2026PriorVLA: Prior-Preserving Adaptation for Vision-Language-Action Models11 May
- 2026Simple Recipe Works: Vision-Language-Action Models are Natural Continual Learners with Reinforcement Learning12 Mar
- 2026Pretrained Vision-Language-Action Models are Surprisingly Resistant to Forgetting in Continual Learning4 Mar
- 2026Towards Long-Lived Robots: Continual Learning VLA Models via Reinforcement Fine-Tuning11 Feb
- 2026CRL-VLA: Continual Vision-Language-Action Learning3 Feb
- 2025Robust Finetuning of Vision-Language-Action Robot Policies via Parameter Merging9 Dec
Other references · 23
- 2021LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language Modelscited by 14,084
- 2016Overcoming catastrophic forgetting in neural networkscited by 4,718
- 2023RT-2: Vision-Language-Action Models Transfer Web Knowledge to Robotic Controlcited by 2,993
- 2024OpenVLA: An Open-Source Vision-Language-Action Modelcited by 2,777
- 2016Learning without Forgettingcited by 2,465
- 2017Gradient Episodic Memory for Continual Learningcited by 1,871
- 2025π0.5: a Vision-Language-Action Model with Open-World Generalizationcited by 1,653
- 2023LIBERO: Benchmarking Knowledge Transfer for Lifelong Robot Learningcited by 1,338
- 2017Memory Aware Synapses: Learning what (not) to forgetcited by 1,094
- 2022Editing Models with Task Arithmeticcited by 1,076
- 2017PackNet: Adding Multiple Tasks to a Single Network by Iterative Pruningcited by 882
- 2021Robust fine-tuning of zero-shot modelscited by 785
11 more
- 2019Linear Mode Connectivity and the Lottery Ticket Hypothesiscited by 627
- 2021Merging Models with Fisher-Weighted Averagingcited by 613
- 2019Orthogonal Gradient Descent for Continual Learningcited by 361
- 2025MolmoAct: Action Reasoning Models that can Reason in Spacecited by 189
- 2023LOTUS: Continual Imitation Learning for Robot Manipulation Through Unsupervised Skill Discoverycited by 63
- 2023Weighted Ensemble Models Are Strong Continual Learnerscited by 41
- 2025Scaling Laws for Forgetting during Finetuning with Pretraining Data Injectioncited by 35
- 2025DataMIL: Selecting Data for Robot Imitation Learning with Datamodelscited by 25
- 2025Skill Expansion and Composition in Parameter Spacecited by 13
- 2026Breaking Lock-In: Preserving Steerability under Low-Data VLA Post-Trainingcited by 6
- 2026TACO: Temporal Consensus Optimization for Continual Neural Mappingcited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025Continual Learning in Vision-Language Models via Aligned Model Merging
- 2025Enhanced Continual Learning of Vision-Language Models with Model Fusion
- 2026OrthoSkillVLA: Continual Skill Learning via Gradient-Informed Skill Subspace Adaptation
- 2024Dual-Phase Continual Learning: Supervised Adaptation Meets Unsupervised Retention
- 2026RECALL: Recovery Experience Collection for Active Lifelong Learning in Vision-Language-Action Models
- 2026PHASER: Phase-Aware and Semantic Experience Replay for Vision-Language-Action Models
- 2026Information-Theoretic Constraints for Continual Vision-Language-Action Alignment
- 2025Memory-Free Continual Learning with Null Space Adaptation for Zero-Shot Vision-Language Models