SenseAgent: An LLM Agent for Adaptive Cross-Domain IMU Sensing
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Deep learning has improved inertial measurement unit (IMU) sensing for mobile and wearable applications. However, an IMU model trained in one domain often becomes unreliable when it is used with a new user, device, or body position. Existing methods usually treat this problem as a static model-design task: they pretrain a stronger representation, add data augmentation, or select one adaptation method before deployment. In practice, the target domain is only gradually observed, labels are scarce, and different domain shifts require different sensing actions. This paper presents SenseAgent, an LLM-guided sensing agent for cross-domain IMU activity recognition. Instead of asking an LLM to classify raw IMU signals, SenseAgent uses the LLM as a runtime planner over sensing tools, source-domain experience memory, online target memory, and verifiers. The agent builds a label-free diagnosis report from the target stream and uses it to decide whether to keep raw inference or invoke specialized tools, including gravity-aware sensing, prototype transfer, and style normalization. Verifiers check source calibration, target-memory reliability, and no-harm criteria before accepting high-risk tool decisions. SenseAgent also supports scarce feedback without retraining the backbone or replacing the label-free route. This design converts cross-domain IMU sensing from a fixed inference pipeline into a closed-loop sensing process that diagnoses target shifts, selects suitable sensing actions, and rejects unsafe adaptations. We evaluate SenseAgent across multiple IMU datasets and deployment shifts. Results show that its verified route selection improves cross-domain sensing, especially under harder placement and compound shifts, and further benefits from limited user feedback.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 13 of its 45 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 25 Sep 2026.
Builds on
13 of 45 references.
References · 13
- 2020A Simple Framework for Contrastive Learning of Visual Representationscited by 12,049
- 2025Qwen3 Technical Reportcited by 8,820
- 2022ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Modelscited by 8,695
- 2023Toolformer: Language Models Can Teach Themselves to Use Toolscited by 4,182
- 2014Learning Phrase Representations using RNN Encoder-Decoder for Statistical Machine Translationcited by 4,057
- 2017Prototypical Networks for Few-shot Learningcited by 3,015
- 2022A Time Series is Worth 64 Words: Long-term Forecasting with Transformerscited by 2,039
- 2018Characterizing and Avoiding Negative Transfercited by 229
- 2022Assessing the State of Self-Supervised Human Activity Recognition using Wearablescited by 65
- 2024IoT-LLM: a framework for enhancing Large Language Model reasoning from real-world sensor datacited by 18
- 2025AutoIOT: LLM-Driven Automated Natural Language Programming for AIoT Applicationscited by 17
- 2024LLaSA: A Sensor-Aware LLM for Natural Language Reasoning of Human Activity from IMU Datacited by 11
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026SensingAgents: A Multi-Agent Collaborative Framework for Robust IMU Activity Recognition
- 2026Dynamic Influence-Weighted Distillation for Single-IMU Activity Recognition
- 2025Towards Generalizable Human Activity Recognition: A Survey
- 2025Refining Diffusion Models for Motion Synthesis with an Acceleration Loss to Generate Realistic IMU Data
- 2025MMA: A Momentum Mamba Architecture for Human Activity Recognition with Inertial Sensors
- 2026RAG-HAR+: Towards Cost-Efficient LLM-Based Human Activity Recognition for Edge Deployment
- 2025AegisAgent: An Autonomous Defense Agent Against Prompt Injection Attacks in LLM-HARs
- 2026Modular Retrieval-Augmented Generalization for Human Action Recognition