Mechanistic Interpretability Reveals Shared Causal Subspaces in Brain-to-Speech Decoders
On the map: Mechanistic interpretability → Circuits and mechanistic analysis
Abstract (arXiv)
Decoding covert speech, such as mimed or imagined, from brain activity is harder than decoding vocalized speech. Cross-modal transfer, where information from one speech form helps decode another, is a promising remedy; yet how a decoder internally represents and processes brain activity from different speech forms remains unclear. In this work, we ask: which internal neurons of a decoder carry cross-modal information, and are these neurons shared across different speech forms? To answer these questions, we leverage mechanistic interpretability, using recordings of the same sentences in vocalized, mimed, and imagined input pairs for activation patching. We insert the decoder's internal activity for a sentence in one condition into its processing of the same sentence in another and measure the change in decoding accuracy. We find that no single neuron drives this benefit; instead, it arises from small groups of neurons, with vocalized speech as the most useful source. These groups are largely condition-specific in the early stage of the decoder but overlap in the later stage. These findings point toward more data-efficient covert speech decoders through training objectives that encourage shared later-stage representations learned mainly from vocalized data.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Circuits and mechanistic analysis, one of 13 directions in Mechanistic interpretability. Builds on 11 of its 21 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 25 Sep 2026.
Builds on
11 of 21 references.
Closest ancestors · 3
Same direction, newest first
- 2025Unboxing the Black Box: Mechanistic Interpretability for Algorithmic Understanding of Neural Networks24 Nov
- 2025Everything, Everywhere, All at Once: Is Mechanistic Interpretability Identifiable?28 Feb
- 2023Towards Automated Circuit Discovery for Mechanistic Interpretability28 Apr
Other references · 8
- 2014Learning Phrase Representations using RNN Encoder-Decoder for Statistical Machine Translationcited by 4,057
- 2020HiFi-GAN: Generative Adversarial Networks for Efficient and High Fidelity Speech Synthesiscited by 1,154
- 2024How to use and interpret activation patchingcited by 214
- 2025Beyond Transcription: Mechanistic Interpretability in ASRcited by 13
- 2026Zero-Shot Imagined Speech Decoding via Imagined-to-Listened MEG Mappingcited by 3
- 2025Interpretable Embeddings of Speech Enhance and Explain Brain Encoding Performance of Audio Modelscited by 2
- 2026Relating the Neural Representations of Vocalized, Mimed, and Imagined Speechcited by 2
- 2025Transfer Learning for Covert Speech Classification Using EEG Hilbert Envelope and Temporal Fine Structurecited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026Mechanistic Interpretability of Brain-to-Speech Models Across Speech Modes
- 2025BrainStratify: Coarse-to-Fine Disentanglement of Intracranial Neural Dynamics
- 2025Decoding the Multimodal Mind: Generalizable Brain-to-Text Translation via Multimodal Alignment and Adaptive Routing
- 2025Condition-Invariant fMRI Decoding of Speech Intelligibility with Deep State Space Model
- 2026Can neurons speak? Semantic narration of vision at single-cell resolution ↗
- 2026Abstraction Induces the Brain Alignment of Language and Speech Models
- 2026Phoneme- vs. Character-Level Targets and Selective State-Space Models for Intracortical Brain-to-Text
- 2024Towards an End-to-End Framework for Invasive Brain Signal Decoding with Large Language Models