mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Averaged Mirror Descent and Dual Gradient Methods: Convergent Algorithms for Entropic Gromov-Wasserstein Problems

arXiv 2609.31848 ↗First posted 25 Sep 2026cs.LG math.OCcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The Gromov-Wasserstein (GW) distance measures the discrepancy between metric measure (mm) spaces and identifies optimal alignments between them based solely on their intrinsic structure. Since it identifies isomorphic mm spaces, it provides a natural notion of distance for heterogeneous datasets which may admit isomorphic representations. In order to accelerate computation of GW distances, many practitioners employ entropic regularization to obtain an Entropic GW (EGW) problem. The most popular EGW solver is the Mirror Descent (MD) algorithm, which reduces EGW computations to an iterative process where an entropic optimal transport (EOT) problem is solved at each iteration. Despite its widespread use, the convergence of MD for this problem has only been established for restricted classes of costs. On the other hand, a recently proposed dual gradient method is available for general costs, but requires a choice of step size which depends on the regularization parameter. To address these two issues, we introduce Averaged Mirror Descent (AMD), which averages consecutive MD steps, and prove its convergence for arbitrary costs. Then, we establish that the dual gradient method with a fixed step size also converges for arbitrary costs at the cost of a more complicated iteration. In both cases, we also account for inexact iterations which are inescapable in practice. We compare the empirical performance of these methods across various settings and, in particular, show that AMD and the dual gradient method both converge on an example where classical MD fails.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 22 of its 38 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 25 Sep 2026.

Builds on

22 of 38 references.

References · 22

  1. 2022Flow Matching for Generative Modelingcited by 5,702
  2. 2013Sinkhorn Distances: Lightspeed Computation of Optimal Transportation Distancescited by 2,316
  3. 2017Improved Training of Wasserstein GANscited by 2,235
  4. 2021Diffusion Schr"odinger Bridge with Applications to Score-Based Generative Modelingcited by 602
  5. 2017Learning Generative Models with Sinkhorn Divergencescited by 314
  6. 2023Denoising Diffusion Samplerscited by 149
  7. 2019Gromov-Wasserstein Learning for Graph Matching and Node Embeddingcited by 126
  8. 2018Gromov-Wasserstein Alignment of Word Embedding Spacescited by 122
  9. 2019Sliced Gromov-Wassersteincited by 66
  10. 2021Linear-Time Gromov Wasserstein Distances using Low Rank Couplings and Costscited by 61
  11. 2020The Unbalanced Gromov Wasserstein Distance: Conic Formulation and Relaxationcited by 56
  12. 2019Learning Generative Models across Incomparable Spacescited by 53
10 more
  1. 2023GENOT: Entropic (Gromov) Wasserstein Flow Matching with Applications to Single-Cell Genomicscited by 28
  2. 2022Learning to Predict Graphs with Fused Gromov-Wasserstein Barycenterscited by 22
  3. 2025Adjoint Schr"odinger Bridge Samplercited by 21
  4. 2023Gromov-Wasserstein unsupervised alignment reveals structural correspondences between the color similarity structures of humans and large language modelscited by 16
  5. 2023Semidefinite Relaxations of the Gromov-Wasserstein Distancecited by 10
  6. 2016Conditional gradient type methods for composite nonlinear and stochastic optimizationcited by 6
  7. 2026Gromov-Wasserstein at Scale, Beyond Squared Normscited by 4
  8. 2025Approximation Analysis of the Entropic Penalty in Quadratic Programmingcited by 3
  9. 2026Sliced Inner Product Gromov-Wasserstein Distancescited by 1
  10. 2026Discrete Gromov-Wasserstein Duality: Algorithms and Isomorphism Testingcited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.