Beyond Sparsity: Weight Location and Network Context in Pruned MRI Reconstruction
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Pruning reduces the number of weights in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) reconstruction networks. Equal sparsity, however, can retain weights with different computational roles and different compatibility with the trained network. We study these effects across 120 convolutional U-Net and vision transformer models using controlled edits evaluated before retraining. In U-Net, preserving high-resolution computation improves reconstruction at equal deletion counts across all tested sparsity levels. Equal-operation controls reveal additional sensitivity of the first convolution, which operation count alone cannot explain. In transformers, retained pretrained weight energy correlates with quality within sparsity levels, yet the same masks reverse their reconstruction ranking when the surrounding trained weights change. At 90% sparsity, matching intermediate output scales largely removes a high-energy-mask penalty while retaining an advantage for the network's original mask. Thus sparsity alone does not characterize reconstruction quality: architecture-specific descriptors are informative, but mask quality can still depend on the surrounding trained network.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 18 of its 23 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 25 Sep 2026.
Builds on
18 of 23 references.
References · 18
- 2015U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentationcited by 19,713
- 2018The Lottery Ticket Hypothesis: Finding Sparse, Trainable Neural Networkscited by 2,262
- 2018SNIP: Single-shot Network Pruning based on Connection Sensitivitycited by 812
- 2023A Simple and Effective Pruning Approach for Large Language Modelscited by 800
- 2018Rethinking the Value of Network Pruningcited by 599
- 2020What is the State of Neural Network Pruning?cited by 583
- 2019Rigging the Lottery: Making All Tickets Winnerscited by 495
- 2020Pruning neural networks without any data by iteratively conserving synaptic flowcited by 479
- 2020Picking Winning Tickets Before Training by Preserving Gradient Flowcited by 471
- 2018fastMRI: An Open Dataset and Benchmarks for Accelerated MRIcited by 470
- 2017MoDL: Model Based Deep Learning Architecture for Inverse Problemscited by 387
- 2017Learning a Variational Network for Reconstruction of Accelerated MRI Datacited by 342
6 more
- 2019On instabilities of deep learning in image reconstruction - Does AI come at a cost?cited by 212
- 2020Pruning Neural Networks at Initialization: Why are We Missing the Mark?cited by 182
- 2020Layer-adaptive sparsity for the Magnitude-based Pruningcited by 126
- 2021Measuring Robustness in Deep Learning Based Compressive Sensingcited by 53
- 2024Pruning Unrolled Networks (PUN) at Initialization for MRI Reconstruction Improves Generalizationcited by 3
- 2025On The Role of K-Space Acquisition in MRI Reconstruction Domain-Generalizationcited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.