Common-Mode Collapse and Recovery in Direct Feedback Alignment
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Direct feedback alignment (DFA) trains hidden layers through fixed random projections of output error. With tanh hidden units and independent sigmoid outputs, plain stochastic gradient descent can stall near the loss of a constant predictor of class frequencies. We trace this stall to the error's common mode, the component shared across inputs. An exact mean-covariance decomposition separates a rank-one update formed by the mean teaching signal and mean presynaptic activity. Its leading component drives tanh units toward saturation. At initialization, random feedback provides no systematic correction of the shared error on average; readout learning limits its duration. A reduced model initialized from the network, without fitted parameters, predicts the concentration of activation sensitivity across 48 settings. On MNIST, class decodability largely survives collapse, but readout learning remains slow at a fixed learning rate. Adam learns faster despite deeper collapse. Calibrating the baseline readout to the class prior suppresses collapse and speeds learning; weaker feedback trades less collapse for slower learning. Replacing errors by their signs sustains collapse; subtracting the signal's batch mean prevents sustained collapse and improves learning in the tested setting. Related effects occur in deeper and convolutional networks and on CIFAR-10, with severity and cost depending on the readout, optimizer and input statistics.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 18 of its 41 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 25 Sep 2026.
Builds on
18 of 41 references.
References · 18
- 2015Batch Normalization: Accelerating Deep Network Training by Reducing Internal Covariate Shiftcited by 7,005
- 2017Fashion-MNIST: a Novel Image Dataset for Benchmarking Machine Learning Algorithmscited by 4,349
- 2016Gaussian Error Linear Units (GELUs)cited by 3,502
- 2013Exact solutions to the nonlinear dynamics of learning in deep linear neural networkscited by 763
- 2020Prevalence of Neural Collapse during the terminal phase of deep learning trainingcited by 719
- 2021Understanding Dimensional Collapse in Contrastive Self-supervised Learningcited by 378
- 2016Direct Feedback Alignment Provides Learning in Deep Neural Networkscited by 240
- 2023The Dormant Neuron Phenomenon in Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 174
- 2018Assessing the Scalability of Biologically-Motivated Deep Learning Algorithms and Architecturescited by 101
- 2024Disentangling the Causes of Plasticity Loss in Neural Networkscited by 86
- 2018Eligibility Traces and Plasticity on Behavioral Time Scales: Experimental Support of neoHebbian Three-Factor Learning Rulescited by 67
- 2020Direct Feedback Alignment Scales to Modern Deep Learning Tasks and Architecturescited by 56
6 more
- 2019Principled Training of Neural Networks with Direct Feedback Alignmentcited by 23
- 2022The Influence of Learning Rule on Representation Dynamics in Wide Neural Networkscited by 19
- 2021Benchmarking the Accuracy and Robustness of Feedback Alignment Algorithmscited by 9
- 2026Overcoming Rank Collapse in Feedback Alignmentcited by 2
- 2026Diffusing Blame: Task-Dependent Credit Assignment in Biologically Plausible Dual-Stream Networkscited by 1
- 2026Conditioned Direct Feedback Alignment via Activity and Error Geometrycited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.