Geometric Inconsistency Localization in Multi-View Image Sets
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Novel view synthesis (NVS) models can produce realistic new views of the same scene from different viewpoints. However, these generated views are not always geometrically consistent with one another. Multi-view (MV) consistency has shown promise as a tool for evaluating these NVS models. Its potential for multimedia forensics, however, remains largely unexplored, particularly for localizing geometric inconsistencies across wide-baseline image pairs. To enable research in this direction, we introduce DeformView, a wide-baseline MV dataset with pixel-level annotations of geometric inconsistencies. Using DeformView, we evaluate state-of-the-art MV consistency-scoring methods and show that approaches developed for NVS evaluation transfer poorly to the forensic task of geometric inconsistency localization. To address this limitation, we propose DEFECt3R, a lightweight learning-based classifier that uses cross-view feature relationships to localize geometric inconsistencies at the pixel level. By learning from explicit supervision, including hard negatives from geometrically consistent yet deformed views, DEFECt3R improves localization performance and substantially reduces false positives compared to existing consistency-scoring methods. Ablation experiments further show that both feature representations and correspondence quality contribute to localization performance. Overall, our findings demonstrate that MV geometric consistency is a promising yet underexplored signal for multimedia forensics and establish a benchmark and baseline for geometric inconsistency localization in wide-baseline MV image pairs. Code and dataset are available at https://github.com/IDLabMedia/DeformView-DEFECt3R
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 14 of its 21 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 25 Sep 2026.
Builds on
14 of 21 references.
References · 14
- 2021Emerging Properties in Self-Supervised Vision Transformerscited by 6,968
- 2022Photorealistic Text-to-Image Diffusion Models with Deep Language Understandingcited by 6,355
- 2021GLIDE: Towards Photorealistic Image Generation and Editing with Text-Guided Diffusion Modelscited by 3,614
- 2024Grounding Image Matching in 3D with MASt3Rcited by 983
- 2022Google Scanned Objects: A High-Quality Dataset of 3D Scanned Household Itemscited by 612
- 2020Leveraging Frequency Analysis for Deep Fake Image Recognitioncited by 504
- 2023Towards Universal Fake Image Detectors that Generalize Across Generative Modelscited by 490
- 2023Intriguing properties of synthetic images: from generative adversarial networks to diffusion modelscited by 123
- 2021Geometry-Free View Synthesis: Transformers and no 3D Priorscited by 100
- 2023Long-Term Photometric Consistent Novel View Synthesis with Diffusion Modelscited by 76
- 2024GenWarp: Single Image to Novel Views with Semantic-Preserving Generative Warpingcited by 73
- 2023Shadows Don't Lie and Lines Can't Bend! Generative Models don't know Projective Geometry...for nowcited by 61
Built on by
Not cited yet.