mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Neuralyzing the Trace: Selective Representation-Level Unlearning with Contrastive Sparse Autoencoders

arXiv 2609.31056 ↗First posted 25 Sep 2026cs.AIcited by 0

On the map: LLM safety and security → Machine unlearning

Abstract (arXiv)

Machine unlearning aims to remove targeted information while preserving a model's other abilities. In realistic settings, such as privacy requests under the EU GDPR, the target may be narrow, for example information associated with a single person. Behavioral forgetting alone may be insufficient, motivating interventions directly on internal representations. However, standard mechanistic-interpretability extractors are poorly selective for such targets. We identify an energy bias in reconstruction-based extraction, which favors dominant background structure over low-energy target-specific components. We introduce SCALPEL, a contrastive sparse autoencoder designed to learn more selective forget features. We show theoretically that contrastive training promotes target-selective features and that our selection score controls expected background knowledge perturbation. We validate SCALPEL experimentally on TOFU across Qwen, Llama, and Gemma, where it substantially improves over NMF and standard SAE interventions and is competitive with Gradient Difference and RMU, bridging mechanistic interpretability and fine-grained unlearning.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Machine unlearning, one of 12 directions in LLM safety and security. Builds on 24 of its 37 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 25 Sep 2026.

Builds on

24 of 37 references.

Closest ancestors · 7

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2025OpenUnlearning: Accelerating LLM Unlearning via Unified Benchmarking of Methods and Metrics14 Jun
  2. 2025Model Unlearning via Sparse Autoencoder Subspace Guided Projections30 May
  3. 2024Unlearning as multi-task optimization: A normalized gradient difference approach with an adaptive learning rate29 Oct
  4. 2024Applying sparse autoencoders to unlearn knowledge in language models25 Oct
  5. 2024A Closer Look at Machine Unlearning for Large Language Models10 Oct
  6. 2024Intrinsic Test of Unlearning Using Parametric Knowledge Traces17 Jun
  7. 2024Negative Preference Optimization: From Catastrophic Collapse to Effective Unlearning8 Apr

Other references · 17

  1. 2020A Simple Framework for Contrastive Learning of Visual Representationscited by 11,979
  2. 2018Representation Learning with Contrastive Predictive Codingcited by 7,662
  3. 2018UMAP: Uniform Manifold Approximation and Projection for Dimension Reductioncited by 2,841
  4. 2020Supervised Contrastive Learningcited by 2,803
  5. 2022Locating and Editing Factual Associations in GPTcited by 2,609
  6. 2019Optuna: A Next-generation Hyperparameter Optimization Frameworkcited by 2,455
  7. 2020Extracting Training Data from Large Language Modelscited by 2,144
  8. 2023Sparse Autoencoders Find Highly Interpretable Features in Language Modelscited by 1,359
  9. 2015Improving Neural Machine Translation Models with Monolingual Datacited by 784
  10. 2022Transformer Feed-Forward Layers Build Predictions by Promoting Concepts in the Vocabulary Spacecited by 522
  11. 2023Dissecting Recall of Factual Associations in Auto-Regressive Language Modelscited by 512
  12. 2024The WMDP Benchmark: Measuring and Reducing Malicious Use With Unlearningcited by 488
5 more
  1. 2024Jumping Ahead: Improving Reconstruction Fidelity with JumpReLU Sparse Autoencoderscited by 283
  2. 2023A Holistic Approach to Unifying Automatic Concept Extraction and Concept Importance Estimationcited by 108
  3. 2026Do Sparse Autoencoders Capture Concept Manifolds?cited by 25
  4. 2023COCKATIEL: COntinuous Concept ranKed ATtribution with Interpretable ELements for explaining neural net classifiers on NLP taskscited by 16
  5. 2024Contrastive Sparse Autoencoders for Interpreting Planning of Chess-Playing Agentscited by 2

Built on by

Not cited yet.