EPOC: Endpoint-Preserving Online Correction With Compressed Residual State for Multi-Horizon Time Series Forecasting
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Completed forecasts provide residual feedback, but retaining full residual blocks increases auxiliary state. We propose Endpoint-Preserving Online Correction (EPOC) with a compressed residual state. It stores low-order discrete cosine transform (DCT) coefficients and the final value of the preceding residual block. Each channel shares the endpoint across component-wise online ridge regressions using current-forecast coefficients. We evaluate eight multivariate series, DLinear and PatchTST, three seeds, and two training variants: 96 matched fixed-base conditions at a 24-step horizon. EPOC achieves mean condition-wise reductions in mean squared error (MSE) and mean absolute error (MAE) of 15.40% and 9.35% from the uncorrected base, respectively, with a median of 6,352 B in retained auxiliary arrays. EPOC also outperforms the δ-Adapter, COSA, FAC, and OMPB in paired MSE on most conditions while retaining less state. Full ELF achieves the largest mean MSE reduction, 19.29%, but its median retained state is 474,048 B (×75 relative to EPOC). Equal-size summary controls favor the endpoint by 1.65--2.20% in paired MSE; a coefficient-reconstructed endpoint yields similar accuracy to the observed endpoint, highlighting its role as a shared input. Increasing the retained DCT component count from 4 to 8 adds 1.00 percentage point of MSE reduction for 5,728 B. On jointly trained bases, EPOC lowers MSE by 16.69--20.15% relative to globally blended TEFL-style adapters applied to the same base. Code and numerical records are available at [https://github.com/keiotakmin/endpoint-preserving-residual-correction](https://github.com/keiotakmin/endpoint-preserving-residual-correction).
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 12 of its 21 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 25 Sep 2026.
Builds on
12 of 21 references.
References · 12
- 2022Are Transformers Effective for Time Series Forecasting?cited by 1,424
- 2023OneNet: Enhancing Time Series Forecasting Models under Concept Drift by Online Ensemblingcited by 74
- 2022Learning Fast and Slow for Online Time Series Forecastingcited by 45
- 2025Battling the Non-stationarity in Time Series Forecasting via Test-time Adaptationcited by 35
- 2023Calibration of Time-Series Forecasting: Detecting and Adapting Context-Driven Distribution Shiftcited by 25
- 2025Lightweight Online Adaption for Time Series Foundation Model Forecastscited by 16
- 2025Accurate Parameter-Efficient Test-Time Adaptation for Time Series Forecastingcited by 14
- 2026The Forecast After the Forecast: A Post-Processing Shift in Time Seriescited by 10
- 2022Residual Correction in Real-Time Traffic Forecastingcited by 8
- 2026Towards Principled Test-Time Adaptation for Time Series Forecastingcited by 5
- 2020Recursive Least Squares with Variable-Direction Forgetting -- Compensating for the loss of persistencycited by 3
- 2026TEFL: Prediction-Residual-Guided Rolling Forecasting for Multi-Horizon Time Seriescited by 2
Built on by
Not cited yet.