mlsanityData to 13 Oct 2026

Encryptability As a Coordinate Choice: Depth-One Homomorphic Federated Learning of Quantum Neural Networks

arXiv 2609.30581 ↗First posted 24 Sep 2026quant-ph cs.CR cs.DCcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Encrypted training relies on keeping server-side updates low-degree. This constraint traditionally excludes models whose weights inhabit a compact Lie group (notably variational quantum circuits, where every trainable weight is an SU(2) rotation). Expressed in Euler angles or discrete alphabets, these updates appear transcendental, historically demanding prohibitive costs: one client--server round per gate, or upwards of 25,000 operations per weight. This penalty is strictly an artefact of coordinates. In the unit-quaternion (spin) chart, group composition is exactly bilinear (degree two, with coefficients in -1,0,+1). Consequently, encrypted rotation updates cost one multiplicative level and federated averaging costs zero in any levelled homomorphic scheme, completely eliminating bootstrapping. This implementation-independent algebraic property is confirmed across two cryptographic backends, introducing only 0.0 and -2.0×10-12 rad of aggregation error. Leveraging this reduction yields a non-interactive protocol for encrypted federated training of hybrid quantum--classical networks. It includes correctness proofs for aggregation and sign handling, plus a compilation lemma proving parameterised entanglers add only constant-factor overhead without altering the depth class. Empirically, a paired five-seed study confirms zero measurable utility tax (Delta=+9×10-6 MSE, p=0.92), and a noise-budget ablation falsifies the hypothesis that encryption noise regularises. These convergence trends replicate across datasets and scale to 20 clients. Finally, hardware validation on a 156-qubit processor achieves 0.9918 fidelity against a 0.99957 unencrypted control.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 13 Oct 2026). Builds on 20 of its 50 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 Sep 2026.

Builds on

20 of 50 references.

References · 20

  1. 2016Communication-Efficient Learning of Deep Networks from Decentralized Datacited by 7,653
  2. 2019Advances and Open Problems in Federated Learningcited by 3,040
  3. 2016Deep Learning with Differential Privacycited by 2,718
  4. 2019Deep Leakage from Gradientscited by 1,017
  5. 2018Tensor field networks: Rotation- and translation-equivariant neural networks for 3D point cloudscited by 739
  6. 2020Inverting Gradients -- How easy is it to break privacy in federated learning?cited by 711
  7. 2020Variational Quantum Algorithmscited by 689
  8. 2018Barren plateaus in quantum neural network training landscapescited by 627
  9. 2020Flower: A Friendly Federated Learning Research Frameworkcited by 453
  10. 2019Parameterized quantum circuits as machine learning modelscited by 332
  11. 2015Unitary Evolution Recurrent Neural Networkscited by 291
  12. 2019Cheap Orthogonal Constraints in Neural Networks: A Simple Parametrization of the Orthogonal and Unitary Groupcited by 133
8 more
  1. 2021Federated Quantum Machine Learningcited by 82
  2. 2021Quantum Federated Learning with Quantum Datacited by 53
  3. 2016Private quantum computation: An introduction to blind quantum computing and related protocolscited by 10
  4. 2024Federated Learning with Quantum Computing and Fully Homomorphic Encryption: A Novel Computing Paradigm Shift in Privacy-Preserving MLcited by 8
  5. 2024Quantum delegated and federated learning via quantum homomorphic encryptioncited by 7
  6. 2017Classical Homomorphic Encryption for Quantum Circuitscited by 6
  7. 2020Quantum Fully Homomorphic Encryption by Integrating Pauli One-time Pad with Quaternionscited by 2
  8. 2025RobQFL: Robust Quantum Federated Learning in Adversarial Environmentcited by 2

Built on by

Not cited yet.