mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Not All Memories Are Equal: Hierarchical Collaborative Memory for Validity-Aware Retrieval in LLM Agents

arXiv 2609.30289 ↗First posted 9 Sep 2026cs.CLcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

In team collaboration scenarios, memory is heterogeneous and continually evolving. Team memories capture collective decisions, protocols, and current consensus, while individual memories preserve member-specific observations, execution traces, and intermediate progress. Existing memory-augmented systems typically retrieve from all stored memories as a flat pool, ranking them by semantic relevance, importance, or recency without modeling hierarchical structure or evolving validity. As a result, they often surface semantically relevant but outdated or conflicting memories, especially individual memories that no longer align with current team consensus, instead of prioritizing currently valid memories. This is particularly problematic when collaborative LLM agents answer user questions, since their responses should be grounded in valid memories. We propose HiCoMER, a framework for hierarchical collaborative memory management and validity-aware retrieval in LLM agents. HiCoMER first maintains the validity of team and individual memories and then retrieves memories that remain valid, rather than retrieving directly from all stored memories. It consists of three components: a Hierarchical Memory Conflict Updater, a Validity-Aware Memory Retriever, and a Memory-Grounded Answer Generator. To evaluate HiCoMER, we construct two new datasets for memory-grounded question answering in collaborative settings. Experiments on both datasets show that HiCoMER consistently outperforms strong baselines by reducing outdated retrieval, preserving current team consensus, and improving downstream QA quality.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 20 of its 29 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 9 Sep 2026.

Builds on

20 of 29 references.

References · 20

  1. 2020Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP Taskscited by 9,160
  2. 2024DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Modelscited by 8,851
  3. 2020Dense Passage Retrieval for Open-Domain Question Answeringcited by 3,779
  4. 2021TruthfulQA: Measuring How Models Mimic Human Falsehoodscited by 2,919
  5. 2017A Broad-Coverage Challenge Corpus for Sentence Understanding through Inferencecited by 2,665
  6. 2020REALM: Retrieval-Augmented Language Model Pre-Trainingcited by 2,126
  7. 2015A large annotated corpus for learning natural language inferencecited by 1,837
  8. 2023Self-RAG: Learning to Retrieve, Generate, and Critique through Self-Reflectioncited by 1,800
  9. 2018FEVER: a large-scale dataset for Fact Extraction and VERificationcited by 1,362
  10. 2023MemGPT: Towards LLMs as Operating Systemscited by 1,295
  11. 2023FActScore: Fine-grained Atomic Evaluation of Factual Precision in Long Form Text Generationcited by 1,259
  12. 2020Leveraging Passage Retrieval with Generative Models for Open Domain Question Answeringcited by 1,203
8 more
  1. 2020ColBERT: Efficient and Effective Passage Search via Contextualized Late Interaction over BERTcited by 1,160
  2. 2022Atlas: Few-shot Learning with Retrieval Augmented Language Modelscited by 940
  3. 2019Adversarial NLI: A New Benchmark for Natural Language Understandingcited by 798
  4. 2019Evaluating the Factual Consistency of Abstractive Text Summarizationcited by 578
  5. 2022Precise Zero-Shot Dense Retrieval without Relevance Labelscited by 508
  6. 2020Asking and Answering Questions to Evaluate the Factual Consistency of Summariescited by 376
  7. 2021SPLADE: Sparse Lexical and Expansion Model for First Stage Rankingcited by 283
  8. 2024Empowering Biomedical Discovery with AI Agentscited by 117

Built on by

Not cited yet.