Safety-oriented pedestrian trajectory prediction at urban intersections using time-to-collision and crossing-zone context
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Accurate pedestrian trajectory prediction is important for proactive road-safety applications, particularly at urban intersections where pedestrian motion is shaped by both vehicle interactions and crossing context. This study presents a safety-oriented trajectory-prediction framework that combines pedestrian motion history with Time-to-Collision (TTC) information and crossing-zone indicators. Using naturalistic trajectories from one urban intersection in the inD (Intersection Drone) dataset, several neural architectures were evaluated with 1.6 s observation and 2.4 s prediction horizons. A pooled Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) separately encodes TTC histories and crossing-zone context before integrating them with pedestrian positions. In addition to conventional Average Displacement Error (ADE) and Final Displacement Error (FDE), prediction performance was assessed using the frequency and magnitude of errors exceeding a study-defined 1 m tolerance. A weighted loss was also introduced to place greater training emphasis on large coordinate-wise errors. Applying this loss to the position-only LSTM reduced ADE from 0.210 to 0.190 m and FDE from 0.550 to 0.503 m, while reducing ADE and FDE exceedance counts by 34.8% and 19.8%, respectively. The final pooled configuration incorporating TTC and crossing-zone information achieved an ADE of 0.184 m and FDE of 0.491 m, with further reductions of 33.5% and 6.3% in ADE and FDE exceedance counts relative to the safety-oriented position-only LSTM. The results indicate that safety-oriented training and structured integration of interaction and contextual information can reduce large trajectory-prediction errors, although broader validation across pedestrians, sites, and datasets is required.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 7 of its 14 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 31 Aug 2026.
Builds on
7 of 14 references.
References · 7
- 2020Transformer Networks for Trajectory Forecastingcited by 181
- 2020DAG-Net: Double Attentive Graph Neural Network for Trajectory Forecastingcited by 30
- 2021Review of Pedestrian Trajectory Prediction Methods: Comparing Deep Learning and Knowledge-based Approachescited by 30
- 2024LG-Traj: LLM Guided Pedestrian Trajectory Predictioncited by 25
- 2023Pedestrian Trajectory Prediction in Pedestrian-Vehicle Mixed Environments: A Systematic Reviewcited by 18
- 2023Evaluating Pedestrian Trajectory Prediction Methods with Respect to Autonomous Drivingcited by 11
- 2023Polar Collision Grids: Effective Interaction Modelling for Pedestrian Trajectory Prediction in Shared Space Using Collision Checkscited by 2
Built on by
Not cited yet.