Leakage-Safe Machine Learning for Hydrogen Embrittlement Detection in 316L Stainless Steel: A Region-Held-Out Evaluation of Texture and Deep Features in SEM Micrographs
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) is routinely used to characterize the microstructural changes caused by hydrogen embrittlement (HE) in structural steels. Machine learning can automate this characterization, but models are often evaluated using image-level splits. When several images come from the same specimen region, such splits leak information between the training and test sets. Here, we propose a region-held-out protocol for classifying as-received (AR) and hydrogen-charged (H2) SEM micrographs of 316L stainless steel, based on Leave-One-Region-Out (LORO) cross-validation over 14 spatial regions (8 AR, 6 H2; 31 images). We compared six feature-classifier combinations built on local binary patterns (LBP), grey-level co-occurrence matrices (GLCM), self-supervised convolutional embeddings pretrained on 143 unlabeled SEM images, and a convolutional neural network (CNN). The simplest texture approach, LBP with a support vector machine (LBP+SVM), performed best, achieving a balanced accuracy of 0.79, H2 recall of 0.69, and H2 precision of 0.82, outperforming every deep-learning and combined-feature model. A group-level permutation test (500 permutations sampled from the 3,003 possible region-to-label assignments) yielded p = 0.008, indicating that the result cannot be explained by a chance alignment of the region structure. Grad-CAM maps from a CNN trained on the full dataset tended to concentrate on localized surface and grain-boundary features, where hydrogen-induced morphological changes are known to occur. Under a leakage-safe, statistically validated protocol, texture descriptors recover a hydrogen-charging signature from SEM micrographs even with few samples, and the same protocol can be extended to larger HE detection studies in other alloy systems.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 6 of its 26 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 23 Sep 2026.
Builds on
6 of 26 references.
References · 6
- 2020A Simple Framework for Contrastive Learning of Visual Representationscited by 11,979
- 2019Surrogate Gradient Learning in Spiking Neural Networkscited by 604
- 2019Hidden Stratification Causes Clinically Meaningful Failures in Machine Learning for Medical Imagingcited by 215
- 2020A Close Look at Deep Learning with Small Datacited by 54
- 2019Deep Learning on Small Datasets without Pre-Training using Cosine Losscited by 41
- 2021How I failed machine learning in medical imaging -- shortcomings and recommendationscited by 37
Built on by
Not cited yet.