Linear RNN Scaling Laws: When Longer Sequences Beat More Sequences
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Empirical scaling laws for autoregressive language models relate prediction loss to model size, data size, and optimization compute, but their theoretical origin is still poorly understood in sequential pretraining settings. We study this question in a tractable teacher--student model where a stable latent linear RNN generates trajectories and a sketched linear recurrent student is trained by safeguarded full-batch WSD gradient descent on next-token prediction. The sketch dimension M plays the role of model size, while N independent trajectories of length P provide the training tokens. We allow the innovation and initialization covariances to have different power-law exponents α and θ. The induced design spectrum produces explicit approximation, optimization, and statistical scaling laws separated by spectral crossovers. When θ≥α, the original one-scale rates M1-βα, R(1-βα)/α, and (NP)-1minM,R1/α are recovered. When α-2r≤θ<α, the heavier initialization tail changes the rates beyond P-dependent model and optimization crossovers. The proof uses a covariance event only internally and a globally safeguarded step size on its complement. The variance retains the factor (NP)-1, while sequence length also suppresses the initialization transient, so N and P cease to be fully interchangeable in the two-scale regime.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 26 of its 33 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 23 Aug 2026.
Builds on
26 of 33 references.
References · 26
- 2020Scaling Laws for Neural Language Modelscited by 6,586
- 2021Scaling Language Models: Methods, Analysis & Insights from Training Gophercited by 1,202
- 2021An Explanation of In-context Learning as Implicit Bayesian Inferencecited by 938
- 2022Transformers learn in-context by gradient descentcited by 732
- 2022What Can Transformers Learn In-Context? A Case Study of Simple Function Classescited by 715
- 2022What learning algorithm is in-context learning? Investigations with linear modelscited by 684
- 2017Deep Learning Scaling is Predictable, Empiricallycited by 582
- 2020Scaling Laws for Autoregressive Generative Modelingcited by 522
- 2021Explaining Neural Scaling Lawscited by 363
- 2022Data Distributional Properties Drive Emergent In-Context Learning in Transformerscited by 309
- 2023Transformers as Statisticians: Provable In-Context Learning with In-Context Algorithm Selectioncited by 298
- 2014Sketching as a Tool for Numerical Linear Algebracited by 288
14 more
- 2019A Constructive Prediction of the Generalization Error Across Scalescited by 210
- 2024How to Train Long-Context Language Models (Effectively)cited by 146
- 2024A Dynamical Model of Neural Scaling Lawscited by 111
- 2024Scaling Laws in Linear Regression: Compute, Parameters, and Datacited by 57
- 2024Fewer Truncations Improve Language Modelingcited by 35
- 2024Mechanics of Next Token Prediction with Self-Attentioncited by 34
- 2024Dataset Decomposition: Faster LLM Training with Variable Sequence Length Curriculumcited by 26
- 2022Learning from many trajectoriescited by 24
- 2025Scaling Laws for Gradient Descent and Sign Descent for Linear Bigram Models under Zipf's Lawcited by 24
- 2024Bayesian scaling laws for in-context learningcited by 19
- 2025Larger Datasets Can Be Repeated More: A Theoretical Analysis of Multi-Epoch Scaling in Linear Regressioncited by 16
- 2025Improved Scaling Laws in Linear Regression via Data Reusecited by 11
- 2025Next-token pretraining implies in-context learningcited by 5
- 2025Towards Auto-Regressive Next-Token Prediction: In-Context Learning Emerges from Generalizationcited by 3
Built on by
Not cited yet.