mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Constraint-Driven Context Engineering: Designing Domain Interfaces for AI Systems

arXiv 2609.27354 ↗First posted 23 Sep 2026cs.SE cs.AIcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Generative AI systems are increasingly deployed to address domain problems. These systems operate under technical, regulatory, institutional, and normative constraints that define acceptable AI behaviour and outcomes within their domains. We observe a recurring pattern in our industry engagement: partners often arrive with a functioning but relatively generic AI solution. The challenge is no longer to build an AI system from scratch, but to improve the quality and domain appropriateness of an AI-generated solution. In these settings, the limiting factor is often the quality, scope, and structure of the context available to the system. Yet, existing context engineering approaches primarily focus on supplying domain knowledge through retrieval, memory, and tools, with limited support for systematically identifying and operationalising the constraints that govern AI systems in their operational environments. This paper proposes Constraint-Driven Context Engineering (CDCE), a design approach for engineering domain interfaces for AI systems. Drawing on software architecture design and Domain-Driven Design (DDD), CDCE treats domain constraints as first-class design drivers. It identifies and characterises constraints, determines the required context assets, and designs representations through which these assets are made available to AI systems. We conducted a comparative multiple-case study with industry and public-sector partners across educational assessment, healthcare decision support, and financial-distress prediction. Depending on their characteristics, constraints can guide AI behaviour, enforce permissible boundaries, or support verification of AI-generated outcomes. The cases demonstrate CDCE's applicability across contrasting domains and show how constraint characteristics shape the resulting domain interfaces.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 9 of its 24 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 23 Sep 2026.

Builds on

9 of 24 references.

References · 9

  1. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,419
  2. 2020Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP Taskscited by 9,297
  3. 2022ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Modelscited by 8,695
  4. 2023Toolformer: Language Models Can Teach Themselves to Use Toolscited by 4,182
  5. 2024LegalBench-RAG: A Benchmark for Retrieval-Augmented Generation in the Legal Domaincited by 118
  6. 2024Rationale-Guided Retrieval Augmented Generation for Medical Question Answeringcited by 41
  7. 2026A Programming Paradigm for Spatiotemporal Composabilitycited by 8
  8. 2023Domain-Driven Design in Software Development: A Systematic Literature Review on Implementation, Challenges, and Effectivenesscited by 2
  9. 2026LLM-as-Judge in Education: A Curriculum-Grounded Marking Pipelinecited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.