Quantifying the Occult: A Comparative Study of Hindu and Buddhist Deities Using Machine Learning Methods
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
This study introduces a dual-matrix computational architecture to mathematically quantify the morphological and theological divergence of 196 Hindu and Vajrayana Buddhist esoteric deities. Physical morphology is evaluated via a discrete Gower distance matrix enhanced by a novel "Cardinality Weighting" algorithm, while theological function is mapped via dense vector embeddings generated from Large Language Model (LLM) semantic expansions, explicitly utilized as a synthetic proxy to mitigate circular reasoning. The multi-modal topological projections provide algorithmic validation of "iconographic camouflage", demonstrating how distinct visual forms structurally obscure shared cross-tradition functions. Furthermore, I computationally model the "Atin Effect" - serving simultaneously as a psychological observation of sequential cognitive bias and a machine learning benchmark - demonstrating how high-cardinality esoteric anchors (e.g., a veena or a severed head) override systemic theological disparities to mathematically cluster orthodox and Tantric entities. Cross-tradition spatial analysis establishes that the highest esoteric manifestations, such as the Hindu Chinnamasta and the Buddhist Chinnamunda, share a near-identical mathematical coordinate across both visual (DG = 0.288) and semantic (DC = 0.068) boundaries, indicating a 1:1 esoteric transfer. By open-sourcing this architecture, I provide a scalable, unsupervised machine learning tool for Digital Humanities scholars and comparative theologians to rigorously map latent structural continuities across qualitative cultural corpora.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 1 of its 28 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 22 Sep 2026.
Builds on
1 of 28 references.
References · 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.