mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Layout-Guided Masking for GROBID: Lightweight Structural Gains in Large-Scale Scientific PDF Ingestion

arXiv 2609.26381 ↗First posted 22 Sep 2026cs.CL cs.DLcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Transforming scholarly PDFs into machine-readable fulltext remains a bottleneck for large-scale information systems. Recent vision-based parsers improve accuracy, but need GPUs and may introduce noise into the extracted text. GROBID, a modular font-stream parser running on CPU, is the de-facto standard for structuring scientific articles and underpins several of the largest open scholarly corpora. We pair it with a lightweight CPU detector localising figure, table, and paratext (header, footer, page number) regions, encoded as typed-area masks whose tokens are routed to GROBID's specialised models or discarded. On two PMC corpora, Bioinformatics (1,926 articles) and Materials Science (2,595), scored against JATS with a section-aware structural protocol, our extension improves over plain GROBID on most metrics (NS +0.025/+0.013; +0.086 paragraph recall on Materials Science, dz=1.08), and caption-linked figure recovery improves on both corpora. On the external Table-BRGM benchmark, table detection recovers F1 0.16 → 0.94 and table structure follows (GriTS-Top 0.27 → 0.78, below the strongest GPU system). On body text, against four vision-based systems (Docling, MinerU, olmOCR, dots.ocr), it has the best paragraph precision on both corpora, the best section detection on Materials Science, and a character error rate within 0.004 of the best GPU parser. End-to-end on CPU, it costs 2.7--3.2× less than the cheapest GPU system (Docling) and 10--14× less than generative parsers.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 20 of its 38 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 22 Sep 2026.

Builds on

20 of 38 references.

References · 20

  1. 2020Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP Taskscited by 9,160
  2. 2020Dense Passage Retrieval for Open-Domain Question Answeringcited by 3,779
  3. 2019PubLayNet: largest dataset ever for document layout analysiscited by 349
  4. 2023Nougat: Neural Optical Understanding for Academic Documentscited by 240
  5. 2019Image-based table recognition: data, model, and evaluationcited by 233
  6. 2022DocLayNet: A Large Human-Annotated Dataset for Document-Layout Analysiscited by 146
  7. 2024OmniDocBench: Benchmarking Diverse PDF Document Parsing with Comprehensive Annotationscited by 144
  8. 2018Construction of the Literature Graph in Semantic Scholarcited by 118
  9. 2025MinerU2.5: A Decoupled Vision-Language Model for Efficient High-Resolution Document Parsingcited by 108
  10. 2025Docling: An Efficient Open-Source Toolkit for AI-driven Document Conversioncited by 58
  11. 2025olmOCR 2: Unit Test Rewards for Document OCRcited by 41
  12. 2021VILA: Improving Structured Content Extraction from Scientific PDFs Using Visual Layout Groupscited by 27
8 more
  1. 2022GriTS: Grid table similarity metric for table structure recognitioncited by 27
  2. 2025PP-DocLayout: A Unified Document Layout Detection Model to Accelerate Large-Scale Data Constructioncited by 26
  3. 2025Does Bigger Mean Better? Comparitive Analysis of CNNs and Biomedical Vision Language Modles in Medical Diagnosiscited by 9
  4. 2022Automatic extraction of materials and properties from superconductors scientific literaturecited by 6
  5. 2026HSD: Training-Free Acceleration for Document Parsing Vision-Language Models with Hierarchical Speculative Decodingcited by 5
  6. 2026Efficient Document Parsing via Parallel Token Predictioncited by 2
  7. 2021Monitoring Open Access at a national level: French case studycited by 1
  8. 2025SciLaD: A Large-Scale, Transparent, Reproducible Dataset for Natural Scientific Language Processingcited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.