mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Magnitude Profile Pruning: Calibration-Free Structured Attention Head Removal for Transformer Compression

arXiv 2609.26177 ↗First posted 11 Aug 2026cs.CL cs.AI cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Structured pruning of attention heads provides a hardware-friendly way to compress Transformer language models. However, existing methods for measuring head-level importance require calibration data, gradient computation, or Hessian estimation. These requirements add extra overhead and make the methods depend on the data. Our work presents Magnitude Profile (MP) scoring, a training-free criterion for head importance that identifies dispensable heads through statistical outlier detection on weight row norms. Heads whose projection weights fall within the population bulk are pruned, while heads exhibiting outlier norms, which carry disproportionate representational capacity, are preserved. Our work further gives MP-G, a variant that handles Grouped Query Attention (GQA) by distributing shared key-value group scores across associated query heads. Across five models evaluated on WikiText-2 perplexity at 12.5%-50% head sparsity, MP-G achieves the best perplexity on OPT-6.7B at all sparsity levels (18.46 at 12.5%, 27.87 at 25%, 152.0 at 50%). MP-G also gives the best results on RoBERTa-large at 12.5% and 25% sparsity, with perplexity values of 7.27 and 10.28, outperforming calibration-dependent baselines including Wanda-Head, SparseGPT-Head, and Gradient-Head. It requires zero forward passes, calibration samples, or gradient computation. At 50% sparsity, head pruning yields up to 16% parameter reduction with 50% attention FLOP savings. Our results show that weight-only statistical scoring can match or outperform data-dependent methods for structured head pruning, providing a practical, zero-cost criterion for Transformer compression.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 19 of its 21 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 11 Aug 2026.

Builds on

19 of 21 references.

References · 19

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
  2. 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,715
  3. 2019RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approachcited by 13,372
  4. 2018GLUE: A Multi-Task Benchmark and Analysis Platform for Natural Language Understandingcited by 4,899
  5. 2022OPT: Open Pre-trained Transformer Language Modelscited by 3,512
  6. 2016Pointer Sentinel Mixture Modelscited by 3,096
  7. 2015Learning both Weights and Connections for Efficient Neural Networkscited by 2,031
  8. 2023GQA: Training Generalized Multi-Query Transformer Models from Multi-Head Checkpointscited by 1,346
  9. 2023SparseGPT: Massive Language Models Can Be Accurately Pruned in One-Shotcited by 1,121
  10. 2019What Does BERT Look At? An Analysis of BERT's Attentioncited by 1,003
  11. 2022LLM.int8(): 8-bit Matrix Multiplication for Transformers at Scalecited by 906
  12. 2019Analyzing Multi-Head Self-Attention: Specialized Heads Do the Heavy Lifting, the Rest Can Be Prunedcited by 856
7 more
  1. 2019Are Sixteen Heads Really Better than One?cited by 816
  2. 2023A Simple and Effective Pruning Approach for Large Language Modelscited by 800
  3. 2023LLM-Pruner: On the Structural Pruning of Large Language Modelscited by 650
  4. 2023Sheared LLaMA: Accelerating Language Model Pre-training via Structured Pruningcited by 415
  5. 2024SliceGPT: Compress Large Language Models by Deleting Rows and Columnscited by 385
  6. 2019Revealing the Dark Secrets of BERTcited by 301
  7. 2022Structured Pruning Learns Compact and Accurate Modelscited by 170

Built on by

Not cited yet.