mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

In-Context Guidance: Learning Inter-Task Synergies via Numerical Foundational Models for Few-Shot Multitask Optimization

arXiv 2609.25836 ↗First posted 22 Sep 2026cs.LG cs.AI cs.NEcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Multi-task optimization (MTO) addresses a set of optimization tasks simultaneously, often suffering from inaccurate inter-task relationship estimation under limited evaluation budgets, leading to negative transfer. This paper introduces In-Context Guidance Multitask Optimization (ICG-MTO), a novel framework that leverages numerical foundational models to improve inter-task coupling estimation in few-shot scenarios. Unlike conventional methods that rely solely on scarce observed data, ICG-MTO employs a frozen foundational model to infer auxiliary guidance through in-context learning. The framework operates through three stages: constructing an algorithm-specific in-context query from evaluated solutions, using the foundational model to infer a guidance signal characterizing predictive relationships among tasks, and translating this signal into algorithm-specific guidance for maximum-a-posteriori coupling estimation. This approach provides regularization during the early, data-scarce stages of optimization and gradually relinquishes control as task-specific observations accumulate. We instantiate the framework in multitask Bayesian optimization as ICG-MTBO, using directional fitness-class queries to guide inter-task coupling estimation, and further instantiate it in MFEA-II using decision-space-overlap queries to guide random mating probability estimation. Experiments across synthetic benchmarks and a real-world robot arm control problem, together with evaluations under different acquisition functions and evolutionary multitasking, demonstrate the effectiveness and generality of ICG-MTO for few-shot multitask optimization.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 18 of its 43 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 22 Sep 2026.

Builds on

18 of 43 references.

References · 18

  1. 2021On the Opportunities and Risks of Foundation Modelscited by 4,033
  2. 2018A Tutorial on Bayesian Optimizationcited by 744
  3. 2018GPyTorch: Blackbox Matrix-Matrix Gaussian Process Inference with GPU Accelerationcited by 609
  4. 2021Transformers Can Do Bayesian Inferencecited by 360
  5. 2025TabICL: A Tabular Foundation Model for In-Context Learning on Large Datacited by 289
  6. 2023Unexpected Improvements to Expected Improvement for Bayesian Optimizationcited by 149
  7. 2025TabPFN-2.5: Advancing the State of the Art in Tabular Foundation Modelscited by 132
  8. 2024TabDPT: Scaling Tabular Foundation Models on Real Datacited by 113
  9. 2020Quality Diversity for Multi-task Optimizationcited by 23
  10. 2024Bayesian Optimization with LLM-Based Acquisition Functions for Natural Language Preference Elicitationcited by 17
  11. 2022Maximum Likelihood Estimation in Gaussian Process Regression is Ill-Posedcited by 16
  12. 2017Evolutionary Multitasking for Single-objective Continuous Optimization: Benchmark Problems, Performance Metric, and Baseline Resultscited by 11
6 more
  1. 2020Scalable Transfer Evolutionary Optimization: Coping with Big Task Instancescited by 6
  2. 2025(θl, θu)-Parametric Multi-Task Optimization: Joint Search in Solution and Infinite Task Spacescited by 4
  3. 2024Surrogate-Assisted Search with Competitive Knowledge Transfer for Expensive Optimizationcited by 2
  4. 2025Large Language Model as Meta-Surrogate for Data-Driven Many-Task Optimization: A Proof-of-Principle Studycited by 1
  5. 2025Multi-Task Surrogate-Assisted Search with Bayesian Competitive Knowledge Transfer for Expensive Optimizationcited by 1
  6. 2025Amortized Multi-Objective Optimization Across Tasks with Generative Solution Modelingcited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.