mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Graph Domain Adaptation Does Not End with Representation Learning

arXiv 2609.25692 ↗First posted 22 Sep 2026cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Graph domain adaptation (GDA) transfers knowledge from a labeled source graph to an unlabeled target graph under shifts in both node attributes and graph structure. Existing methods primarily adapt graph representations through propagation redesign, distribution alignment, or source-to-target transition modeling, but still rely on a single graph-propagating path for target prediction. This leaves open whether an adapted graph representation exhausts the predictive evidence available in the target domain, since the graph-aware expert and graph-free local expert may exhibit different failure modes under topological shifts. To address this limitation, we propose EviGDA, an Evidence-Augmented Graph Domain Adaptation framework that complements graph representation adaptation with a graph-free local expert. The graph-aware expert performs message passing and entropy-aware marginal alignment, while the graph-free local expert learns solely from source node features and labels without graph propagation or target alignment. The two experts are optimized independently and combined only at inference through a task-level constant probability mixture, preserving complementary evidence without joint training, learned routing, or target pseudo-labels. Extensive experiments on ten datasets and 16 transfer tasks show that EviGDA outperforms state-of-the-art baselines. Complementary prediction paths add value beyond graph representation alignment.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 25 of its 36 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 22 Sep 2026.

Builds on

25 of 36 references.

References · 25

  1. 2016Semi-Supervised Classification with Graph Convolutional Networkscited by 11,361
  2. 2016Simple and Scalable Predictive Uncertainty Estimation using Deep Ensemblescited by 3,926
  3. 2017Outrageously Large Neural Networks: The Sparsely-Gated Mixture-of-Experts Layercited by 3,509
  4. 2015Domain-Adversarial Training of Neural Networkscited by 3,044
  5. 2015Learning Transferable Features with Deep Adaptation Networkscited by 1,329
  6. 2017Adversarial Discriminative Domain Adaptationcited by 1,311
  7. 2016Deep CORAL: Correlation Alignment for Deep Domain Adaptationcited by 1,200
  8. 2019Graph Transfer Learning via Adversarial Domain Adaptation with Graph Convolutioncited by 67
  9. 2020The Information Bottleneck Problem and Its Applications in Machine Learningcited by 66
  10. 2023Structural Re-weighting Improves Graph Domain Adaptationcited by 45
  11. 2020Adversarial Deep Network Embedding for Cross-network Node Classificationcited by 44
  12. 2019DANE: Domain Adaptive Network Embeddingcited by 43
13 more
  1. 2022Non-IID Transfer Learning on Graphscited by 43
  2. 2021Graph Domain Adaptation: A Generative Viewcited by 35
  3. 2024Rethinking Propagation for Unsupervised Graph Domain Adaptationcited by 31
  4. 2024Pairwise Alignment Improves Graph Domain Adaptationcited by 25
  5. 2025On the Benefits of Attribute-Driven Graph Domain Adaptationcited by 19
  6. 2024SA-GDA: Spectral Augmentation for Graph Domain Adaptationcited by 16
  7. 2024Smoothness Really Matters: A Simple Yet Effective Approach for Unsupervised Graph Domain Adaptationcited by 14
  8. 2024Can Modifying Data Address Graph Domain Adaptation?cited by 9
  9. 2025Homophily Enhanced Graph Domain Adaptationcited by 9
  10. 2025GraphBridge: Towards Arbitrary Transfer Learning in GNNscited by 4
  11. 2026Learning Structure-Semantic Evolution Trajectories for Graph Domain Adaptationcited by 4
  12. 2025Enhancing Node-Level Graph Domain Adaptation by Alleviating Local Dependencycited by 1
  13. 2026Learning Adaptive Distribution Alignment with Neural Characteristic Function for Graph Domain Adaptationcited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.