Real-Time Atomic-Resolution Electron Phase Imaging without Probe Calibration via Ptychography-Supervised Learning
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Atomic-scale phase imaging is central to resolving defects, interfaces, and weakly scattering atoms that govern the behavior of nanoscale materials. Electron ptychography delivers sub-aangstr"om phase sensitivity but remains an offline technique, because its iterative reconstruction is computationally expensive and sensitive to experimental calibration, preventing live use during data acquisition. Here, a ptychography-supervised local inference framework is presented that converts four-dimensional scanning transmission electron microscopy (4D-STEM) into an acquisition-compatible phase-imaging workflow. Physics-constrained reference phase maps reconstructed from a single experimental AuPd dataset serve as teacher labels for a compact model that predicts local phase patches directly from diffraction measurements, without explicit probe input or online iterative optimization. Full-field images are assembled by deterministic overlap stitching. The workflow reaches an online latency of about 0.27 ms per probe position and a throughput of about 20,000 positions per second, an approximately 1,000-fold speed-up over GPU-accelerated ePIE, while preserving atomic-scale lattice contrast and reciprocal-space fidelity. Without fine-tuning, the same model transfers across materials (WS2), defocus conditions (high-entropy alloy nanoparticles), and instruments (hBN at 300 kV). The approach amortizes ptychographic redundancy into a fast, generalizable workflow that enables real-time atomic-scale phase imaging for materials microscopy.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 12 of its 33 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 22 Sep 2026.
Builds on
12 of 33 references.
References · 12
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
- 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 30,186
- 2017Squeeze-and-Excitation Networkscited by 4,789
- 2015Dropout as a Bayesian Approximation: Representing Model Uncertainty in Deep Learningcited by 4,448
- 2016DeepLab: Semantic Image Segmentation with Deep Convolutional Nets, Atrous Convolution, and Fully Connected CRFscited by 3,241
- 2017Deep Image Priorcited by 1,098
- 2020Deep Learning Techniques for Inverse Problems in Imagingcited by 291
- 2019On instabilities of deep learning in image reconstruction - Does AI come at a cost?cited by 212
- 2023On the use of deep learning for phase recoverycited by 20
- 2022Deep learning at the edge enables real-time streaming ptychographic imagingcited by 17
- 2024A Physics-Inspired Deep Learning Framework with Polar Coordinate Attention for Ptychographic Imagingcited by 4
- 2021Using a modified double deep image prior for crosstalk mitigation in multislice ptychographycited by 3
Built on by
Not cited yet.