mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

A digital-twin framework for forecasting treatment-day imaging with contour uncertainty in adaptive proton radiotherapy

arXiv 2609.24725 ↗First posted 21 Sep 2026physics.med-ph cs.AIcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Head-and-neck anatomy changes over a six-to-seven-week proton course, and the anatomy of a later week cannot be imaged when the plan is made. We present a digital-twin framework that forecasts a patient's treatment-day anatomy as an ensemble of predicted CTs with propagated contours and quantifies the uncertainty of the forecast contours. The twin is a library of previously treated patients with planning and weekly quality-assurance CTs (QACTs), made patient-specific by a two-step foundation-model deformable registration: a cross-patient field carries each library patient onto the current patient, and a longitudinal field, estimated in the current patient's frame, carries that patient's planning-to-QACT change onto the current patient's own planning CT. A library of 302 observations from 88 patients yields about 300 replicates per patient, each a deformation that occurred in a treated patient. The dispersion of the propagated contours, resolved by outward normal, is six-direction contour uncertainty in millimeters. This is uncertainty in the input to the forecast, which library patient the current patient follows, rather than in model parameters, and it is unchanged when the registration engine is exchanged. On ten patients with clinician contours on two QACTs, the library alone fixes the anisotropic shape of the uncertainty (4.5 to 6.2 mm); the first QACT narrows it by a factor of 3.2 to 3.6 without a contour being drawn; an approved contour improves the center but not the width. The estimate orders directions correctly but is not Gaussian-calibrated. A clinical target volume expansion is worked out as one application.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 9 of its 20 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 21 Sep 2026.

Builds on

9 of 20 references.

References · 9

  1. 2015Dropout as a Bayesian Approximation: Representing Model Uncertainty in Deep Learningcited by 4,448
  2. 2017What Uncertainties Do We Need in Bayesian Deep Learning for Computer Vision?cited by 2,352
  3. 2019Aleatoric and Epistemic Uncertainty in Machine Learning: An Introduction to Concepts and Methodscited by 913
  4. 2019Unsupervised Learning of Probabilistic Diffeomorphic Registration for Images and Surfacescited by 186
  5. 2019Confidence Calibration and Predictive Uncertainty Estimation for Deep Medical Image Segmentationcited by 163
  6. 2014Multi-Atlas Segmentation of Biomedical Images: A Surveycited by 56
  7. 2023Predictive Digital Twin for Optimizing Patient-Specific Radiotherapy Regimens under Uncertainty in High-Grade Gliomascited by 12
  8. 2026Universal CT Representations from Anatomy to Disease Phenotype through Agglomerative Pretrainingcited by 4
  9. 2026Anticipatory Digital Twins for Online Head-and-Neck Adaptive Proton Therapy via Foundation-Model Registrationcited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.