Not All Task Vectors Need Equal Rank: Energy-Proportional Allocation for Model Merging
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Model merging aims to combine multiple fine-tuned models derived from a common pretrained model into a single multi-task model without additional joint training. Recent spectral merging methods improve over simple weight averaging by exploiting low-rank structures of task-specific updates, but they commonly assign the same rank capacity to every task. This uniform allocation ignores that task vectors can have heterogeneous spectral complexity, causing the shared merging space to be used suboptimally. In this paper, we propose Spectral Energy-proportional Rank Allocation (SERA), a simple task-adaptive strategy that allocates ranks according to the singular-value energy structure of each task vector. By assigning richer spectral capacity to complex or isolated tasks and fewer directions to compact tasks, SERA extends SVD-based model merging from uniform-capacity merging to task-dependent capacity allocation. Experiments under standard vision model merging protocols show that SERA improves multi-task merging performance while preserving the same total rank budget as existing spectral merging methods. Further analysis demonstrates that task-level spectral concentration is closely related to the per-task effect of adaptive rank allocation, providing insight into when and why SERA is effective.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 23 of its 36 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 21 Sep 2026.
Builds on
23 of 36 references.
References · 23
- 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,744
- 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 30,186
- 2013Describing Textures in the Wildcited by 2,125
- 2017EuroSAT: A Novel Dataset and Deep Learning Benchmark for Land Use and Land Cover Classificationcited by 1,496
- 2022Model soups: averaging weights of multiple fine-tuned models improves accuracy without increasing inference timecited by 1,396
- 2022Editing Models with Task Arithmeticcited by 1,120
- 2023TIES-Merging: Resolving Interference When Merging Modelscited by 818
- 2017Remote Sensing Image Scene Classification: Benchmark and State of the Artcited by 797
- 2023Language Models are Super Mario: Absorbing Abilities from Homologous Models as a Free Lunchcited by 694
- 2021Merging Models with Fisher-Weighted Averagingcited by 621
- 2018Loss Surfaces, Mode Connectivity, and Fast Ensembling of DNNscited by 588
- 2022Dataless Knowledge Fusion by Merging Weights of Language Modelscited by 387
11 more
- 2023AdaMerging: Adaptive Model Merging for Multi-Task Learningcited by 252
- 2024Task Singular Vectors: Reducing Task Interference in Model Mergingcited by 147
- 2024Localizing Task Information for Improved Model Merging and Compressioncited by 131
- 2024Model merging with SVD to tie the Knotscited by 122
- 2025No Task Left Behind: Isotropic Model Merging with Common and Task-Specific Subspacescited by 96
- 2024Model Stock: All we need is just a few fine-tuned modelscited by 92
- 2024Parameter Competition Balancing for Model Mergingcited by 72
- 2025Whoever Started the Interference Should End It: Guiding Data-Free Model Merging via Task Vectorscited by 62
- 2025AdaRank: Adaptive Rank Pruning for Enhanced Model Mergingcited by 9
- 2026DC-Merge: Improving Model Merging with Directional Consistencycited by 8
- 2025Purifying Task Vectors in Knowledge-Aware Subspace for Model Mergingcited by 3
Built on by
Not cited yet.