SPeaR: Test-Time Adaptation with Steering Primitives for Realigning Representations
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Test-time adaptation (TTA) addresses distribution shift using only unlabeled test data. Existing methods typically adapt pretrained models by updating their parameters, limiting both what is adapted and where adaptation can occur within the network. We instead keep the pretrained network frozen and steer its intermediate representations. We introduce SPeaR (Steering Primitive for Realigning Representations), which inserts lightweight learnable modules at stage boundaries and optimizes them directly from the test stream, requiring neither source data nor supervised warm-up. Each primitive is optimized using a gated objective that reduces uncertainty only when adaptation is beneficial, along with a diversity regularizer to prevent collapse, and a multi-depth anchor to stabilize adaptation. We show that steering early representations is the most effective strategy, and that the same primitive transfers across convolutional and Transformer architectures. Across CIFAR-10-C, CIFAR-100-C, and ImageNet-C, SPeaR consistently matches or outperforms methods that adapt orders of magnitude more parameters, remains robust across a wide range of batch sizes, and preserves source-domain performance during continual adaptation.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 25 of its 35 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 21 Sep 2026.
Builds on
25 of 35 references.
References · 25
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
- 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 30,186
- 2020A Simple Framework for Contrastive Learning of Visual Representationscited by 12,049
- 2015Domain-Adversarial Training of Neural Networkscited by 3,044
- 2019Benchmarking Neural Network Robustness to Common Corruptions and Perturbationscited by 2,877
- 2019Similarity of Neural Network Representations Revisitedcited by 1,755
- 2020WILDS: A Benchmark of in-the-Wild Distribution Shiftscited by 1,375
- 2019AugMix: A Simple Data Processing Method to Improve Robustness and Uncertaintycited by 901
- 2020RobustBench: a standardized adversarial robustness benchmarkcited by 661
- 2021How to train your ViT? Data, Augmentation, and Regularization in Vision Transformerscited by 569
- 2022Efficient Test-Time Model Adaptation without Forgettingcited by 469
- 2020Improving robustness against common corruptions by covariate shift adaptationcited by 431
13 more
- 2023Towards Stable Test-Time Adaptation in Dynamic Wild Worldcited by 415
- 2021MEMO: Test Time Robustness via Adaptation and Augmentationcited by 377
- 2018A Survey of Unsupervised Deep Domain Adaptationcited by 361
- 2021High-Performance Large-Scale Image Recognition Without Normalizationcited by 360
- 2023A Comprehensive Survey on Test-Time Adaptation under Distribution Shiftscited by 359
- 2023Robust Test-Time Adaptation in Dynamic Scenarioscited by 189
- 2023EcoTTA: Memory-Efficient Continual Test-time Adaptation via Self-distilled Regularizationcited by 123
- 2024Entropy is not Enough for Test-Time Adaptation: From the Perspective of Disentangled Factorscited by 106
- 2021Test-Time Adaptation to Distribution Shift by Confidence Maximization and Input Transformationcited by 68
- 2023Universal Test-time Adaptation through Weight Ensembling, Diversity Weighting, and Prior Correctioncited by 65
- 2021SITA: Single Image Test-time Adaptationcited by 59
- 2023In Search of Lost Online Test-time Adaptation: A Surveycited by 44
- 2023Rapid Network Adaptation: Learning to Adapt Neural Networks Using Test-Time Feedbackcited by 10
Built on by
Not cited yet.