mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

PROSE: A Theory of Optimal Stopping with Perishable Evidence for Peer Selection in Intermittently Connected Decentralised Learning

arXiv 2609.23845 ↗First posted 20 Sep 2026cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Decentralised federated learning removes the aggregation server but makes collaboration dependent on transient peer availability. In mobile and intermittently connected systems, evaluating a promising peer consumes contact time and may cause the exchange opportunity itself to vanish, so that the evidence a learner gathers about a peer is perishable: it decays because links expire and because peer models drift while old measurements age. This paper develops a self-contained theory of optimal stopping for the resulting peer-selection problem. We formalise a receiver's within-contact decision as a finite-horizon Markov optimal-stopping problem with costly information acquisition and a future-arrival outside option, and prove that it admits an optimal policy characterised by a reservation value (Snell-envelope structure). Around this formulation we prove: (i) stage-uniform, drift-aware concentration and a maximin certification rule that is correct with high probability together with a finite-sample identification bound; (ii) a mobility-aware value of-information stopping rule and comparative statics showing that higher link hazard lowers the value of continued probing and enlarges the stopping region; (iii) a closed-form value of waiting under marked-Poisson contact arrivals, together with a search-theoretic reservation value whose comparative statics we characterise; and (iv) a myopic-optimality theorem establishing that, in sufficiently volatile (monotone) mobility regimes, the one-step confidence-safe rule is a sound surrogate for the optimal policy and never stops prematurely. We instantiate the theory as PROSE (Perishable-evidence Reservation-value Optimal Stopping for Exchange), a lightweight, fully local policy, and delineate the static contact and drift-free limits in which classical sequential decision problems are recovered. The development is entirely analytical.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 6 of its 24 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 20 Sep 2026.

Builds on

6 of 24 references.

References · 6

  1. 2016Communication-Efficient Learning of Deep Networks from Decentralized Datacited by 7,669
  2. 2019Advances and Open Problems in Federated Learningcited by 3,046
  3. 2017Can Decentralized Algorithms Outperform Centralized Algorithms? A Case Study for Decentralized Parallel Stochastic Gradient Descentcited by 502
  4. 2020Decentralized Federated Learning via Mutual Knowledge Transfercited by 43
  5. 2025Mobility-Aware Decentralized Federated Learning with Joint Optimization of Local Iteration and Leader Selection for Vehicular Networkscited by 5
  6. 2021DACFL: Dynamic Average Consensus Based Federated Learning in Decentralized Topologycited by 3

Built on by

Not cited yet.