Physics-residual machine learning predicts oxygen-evolution catalyst activity beyond the training range from sparse polarization measurements
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Discovery campaigns for oxygen evolution reaction catalysts repeatedly choose, make and measure catalysts. High-throughput platforms stop polarization curves below potentials that damage the catalyst, so the endpoint, the activity at a target potential or current density, often lies beyond the measured window, and the catalysts of most interest are more active than any measured before. Existing methods do not predict these endpoints accurately when few or no endpoints of a new library have been measured. Here we present physics-residual machine learning (PR-ML), which predicts each endpoint as the sum of a Tafel term, computed from the catalyst's own measured curve with an estimated slope, and a residual term learned from labelled catalysts. In twelve Ni-Pd-Pt-Ru thin-film libraries, the current density at 1.70 VRHE was predicted from the currents at 1.40 and 1.55 VRHE. Fitted only on earlier libraries, with ridge regression as the residual learner, PR-ML predicted the Ni--Ru library, whose currents mostly exceed theirs, with a mean absolute error of 0.194 mA cm-2, against 1.330-1.882 for data-driven models. With five endpoints from the new library and extremely randomized trees as the residual learner, PR-ML gave a similar error, which the same learner used alone reached only with 20, and identified 63-83% of the catalysts more active than the best labelled catalyst, against 2%. In two independent datasets, this fraction rose from at most 1% to 33-95%. Our approach supplies catalyst selection with accurate endpoints beyond the measured part of each curve and above all earlier measurements.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 6 of its 46 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 20 Sep 2026.
Builds on
6 of 46 references.
References · 6
- 2014Freeze-Thaw Bayesian Optimizationcited by 86
- 2024Structure-based out-of-distribution (OOD) materials property prediction: a benchmark studycited by 17
- 2024Best Practices for Multi-Fidelity Bayesian Optimization in Materials and Molecular Researchcited by 7
- 2025Known Unknowns: Out-of-Distribution Property Prediction in Materials and Moleculescited by 7
- 2024A General Approach for Determining Applicability Domain of Machine Learning Modelscited by 5
- 2025Hard-constraint physics-residual networks for hydrogen crossover prediction and high-pressure extrapolation in PEM water electrolysiscited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.