Expansion Counts under Standard A* Tie-Breaking Strategies on the Final Plateau
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
In the A* search algorithm, the tie-breaking strategies for nodes with the same f-value determines which states A* expands on the final f-layer. For nine standard tie-breaking strategies, we show that under a consistent heuristic, every pair has positive-cost instances favoring each strategy over the other by an arbitrarily large additive expansion gap. A parameterized unit-cost grid example also gives unbounded expansion-count ratios between low-h with FIFO and LIFO. In unit-cost search with h > 0 at non-goals, exact heuristic values near the goal lead to complementary extremal results: low-h minimizes the number of remaining expansions from a common configuration within the perfect region, while high-h maximizes the total number of expansions when every final-plateau state with h=1 is a goal predecessor. Finally, with the evaluation function fα = g + α h, when h>0 at non-goals, every heuristic weight 0 ≤ α<1 eliminates tie-breaking sensitivity, and all tie-breaking strategies expand the same set of states.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 0 of its 20 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 20 Sep 2026.
Builds on
0 of 20 references.
No references here yet.
Built on by
Not cited yet.