Look Before You Steer: Geometry Predicts SAE Feature Steerability
On the map: Mechanistic interpretability → SAE features and their applications
Abstract (arXiv)
Steering with SAE features requires per-feature coefficient tuning, which currently demands intervention sweeps. We ask whether properties of the SAE itself, computable before any forward pass, predict which features will be cheap or expensive to steer. We show that variation in SAE feature steerability is partially predicted by decoder-space geometry: neighbor density and maximum cosine similarity to nearby decoder directions, both computable from the SAE weight matrix before any intervention, rank features by how much steering they require for a fixed behavioral effect (ρ up to -0.546, p < 10-6, AUROC 0.610-0.822 across conditions; the signal is rank-based, consistent with grid discreteness). This geometry-steerability relationship replicates across two Gemma-2 model scales (2B and 9B), two SAE widths (16K and 65K), and is detectable cross-architecturally on Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct (ρ = -0.266, n = 300). On Qwen3-8B with BatchTopK SAEs, geometry predicts whether a feature is steerable at all but not the continuous ordering among responsive features, revealing a boundary condition tied to SAE training regime. The signal weakens at deep proportional layer depth in both models, where the cost of steering exceeds our intervention budget, a consistent depth boundary. These results provide preliminary evidence that pre-steering geometry can partially inform coefficient selection, offering a path toward screening features for controllability before deployment.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in SAE features and their applications, one of 13 directions in Mechanistic interpretability. Builds on 13 of its 21 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 19 Sep 2026.
Builds on
13 of 21 references.
Closest ancestors · 4
Same direction, newest first
- 2026Scaling Monosemanticity: Extracting Interpretable Features from Claude 3 Sonnet28 May
- 2025SAEs Are Good for Steering -- If You Select the Right Features26 May
- 2024BatchTopK Sparse Autoencoders9 Dec
- 2023Sparse Autoencoders Find Highly Interpretable Features in Language Models15 Sep
Other references · 9
- 2021TruthfulQA: Measuring How Models Mimic Human Falsehoodscited by 2,975
- 2023GPQA: A Graduate-Level Google-Proof Q&A Benchmarkcited by 2,879
- 2023Representation Engineering: A Top-Down Approach to AI Transparencycited by 1,336
- 2023Inference-Time Intervention: Eliciting Truthful Answers from a Language Modelcited by 1,302
- 2023Steering Llama 2 via Contrastive Activation Additioncited by 1,085
- 2022Toy Models of Superpositioncited by 971
- 2024Gemma Scope: Open Sparse Autoencoders Everywhere All At Once on Gemma 2cited by 394
- 2024The Geometry of Categorical and Hierarchical Concepts in Large Language Modelscited by 159
- 2025Tracing the Representation Geometry of Language Models from Pretraining to Post-trainingcited by 35
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026Pre-Intervention Prediction of Sparse Autoencoder Steering Side Effects
- 2026Predicting Where Steering Vectors Succeed
- 2026Steerable but Not Decodable: Function Vectors Operate Beyond the Logit Lens
- 2026Enhancing SAE-based Steering via Neighbor Integrated Feature Selection
- 2026When is Your LLM Steerable?
- 2024Improving Steering Vectors by Targeting Sparse Autoencoder Features
- 2026Curveball Steering: The Right Direction To Steer Isn't Always Linear
- 2026Understanding Unreliability of Steering Vectors in Language Models: Geometric Predictors and the Limits of Linear Approximations