mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Intervention, Not Shared Latents: Blocking Visual Shortcuts in Audio-Video Generation

arXiv 2609.22361 ↗First posted 14 Aug 2026cs.LG cs.GR cs.SDcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Joint audio--video (AV) generators are trained on data in which what an event looks like and what it sounds like are spuriously correlated. We present a controlled causal study of the resulting failure mode. In an AV structural causal model where the audio is, by construction, independent of the video's nuisance appearance, models that let audio read video directly---through cross-attention or a shared latent---learn a visual shortcut: they predict sound from appearance rather than the causal event and, when the appearance--event correlation is broken at test time, synthesize the wrong event's sound. Crucially, the popular remedy of routing both modalities through a shared common-cause latent does not fix this---a bottleneck, an unsupervised shared/private factorization, and a faithful shared-prior model all grab the appearance proxy and fail like the direct model. Blocking the shortcut instead requires an intervention on the nuisance: under the stated assumptions we prove that counterfactual invariance is necessary and sufficient to identify the causal predictor, and we verify the mechanism from feature-vector SCMs to procedural pixel video, real images with spectrogram audio, moving real digits, and a conditional generator. On a real, pretrained V2A generator (MMAudio), an input-intervention test shows the model is far from invariant to sound-irrelevant edits, though a generic-noise control reveals it is broadly input-brittle rather than specifically colour-shortcutting---clean isolation of the shortcut needs the controlled confounds our synthetic studies provide. We characterize when the shortcut occurs, compare the objective against supervised counterfactual augmentation, and isolate the unknown-nuisance regime---where the intervention cannot be applied---as the central open problem.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 18 of its 22 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 14 Aug 2026.

Builds on

18 of 22 references.

References · 18

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
  2. 2022Flow Matching for Generative Modelingcited by 5,702
  3. 2015Domain-Adversarial Training of Neural Networkscited by 3,044
  4. 2020Shortcut Learning in Deep Neural Networkscited by 1,969
  5. 2019Invariant Risk Minimizationcited by 1,854
  6. 2019Distributionally Robust Neural Networks for Group Shifts: On the Importance of Regularization for Worst-Case Generalizationcited by 1,247
  7. 2020In Search of Lost Domain Generalizationcited by 1,054
  8. 2018Challenging Common Assumptions in the Unsupervised Learning of Disentangled Representationscited by 941
  9. 2020Out-of-Distribution Generalization via Risk Extrapolation (REx)cited by 742
  10. 2022Large-scale Contrastive Language-Audio Pretraining with Feature Fusion and Keyword-to-Caption Augmentationcited by 719
  11. 2026LTX-2: Efficient Joint Audio-Visual Foundation Modelcited by 236
  12. 2022MM-Diffusion: Learning Multi-Modal Diffusion Models for Joint Audio and Video Generationcited by 227
6 more
  1. 2023Diff-Foley: Synchronized Video-to-Audio Synthesis with Latent Diffusion Modelscited by 134
  2. 2024MMAudio: Taming Multimodal Joint Training for High-Quality Video-to-Audio Synthesiscited by 134
  3. 2024Seeing and Hearing: Open-domain Visual-Audio Generation with Diffusion Latent Alignerscited by 111
  4. 2025JavisDiT: Joint Audio-Video Diffusion Transformer with Hierarchical Spatio-Temporal Prior Synchronizationcited by 88
  5. 2026Do Joint Audio-Video Generation Models Understand Physics?cited by 8
  6. 2026Benchmarking Single-Factor Physical Video-to-Audio Generationcited by 2

Built on by

Not cited yet.