mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Correlation-Aware Structured Pruning for Large Language Models

arXiv 2609.22131 ↗First posted 23 Aug 2026cs.CL cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Structured pruning is a promising approach for reducing the substantial inference costs of Large Language Models (LLMs) while maintaining hardware efficiency. Many existing methods assess the importance of prunable units (e.g., channels or heads) in isolation, implicitly assuming that pruning errors are additive. This independence assumption is often invalidated by the non-orthogonality of model weights and strong correlations between unit activations, potentially leading to performance degradation. To address this, we propose a Correlation-Aware Structured Pruning method. We formulate the pruning objective as a cardinality-constrained binary quadratic program that explicitly models cross-unit dependencies in the reconstruction error. Since this binary quadratic program is NP-hard and difficult to solve exactly, we develop a greedy interaction algorithm based on dependency-aware marginal costs to optimize unit selection. Furthermore, we incorporate a gradient-based strategy to achieve adaptive layer-wise sparsity allocation across the entire model. Extensive experiments on mainstream LLMs demonstrate that incorporating correlation information yields competitive accuracy-efficiency trade-offs compared to representative structured pruning baselines.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 15 of its 24 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 23 Aug 2026.

Builds on

15 of 24 references.

References · 15

  1. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,419
  2. 2018Think you have Solved Question Answering? Try ARC, the AI2 Reasoning Challengecited by 4,886
  3. 2019HellaSwag: Can a Machine Really Finish Your Sentence?cited by 4,100
  4. 2016Pointer Sentinel Mixture Modelscited by 3,096
  5. 2019PIQA: Reasoning about Physical Commonsense in Natural Languagecited by 2,883
  6. 2021Convex optimizationcited by 2,515
  7. 2019BoolQ: Exploring the Surprising Difficulty of Natural Yes/No Questionscited by 2,183
  8. 2018Can a Suit of Armor Conduct Electricity? A New Dataset for Open Book Question Answeringcited by 2,164
  9. 2023SparseGPT: Massive Language Models Can Be Accurately Pruned in One-Shotcited by 1,121
  10. 2023A Simple and Effective Pruning Approach for Large Language Modelscited by 800
  11. 2019How Contextual are Contextualized Word Representations? Comparing the Geometry of BERT, ELMo, and GPT-2 Embeddingscited by 784
  12. 2024ShortGPT: Layers in Large Language Models are More Redundant Than You Expectcited by 383
3 more
  1. 2022A Fast Post-Training Pruning Framework for Transformerscited by 162
  2. 2024EvoPress: Accurate Dynamic Model Compression via Evolutionary Searchcited by 20
  3. 2025Probe Pruning: Accelerating LLMs through Dynamic Pruning via Model-Probingcited by 14

Built on by

Not cited yet.