mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Configurable Multi-Stage Vision Pipeline for Crop Disease and Pest Diagnosis

arXiv 2609.21651 ↗First posted 18 Sep 2026cs.CV cs.CL cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

FarmerChat is Digital Green's farm advisory service for smallholder farmers. When something looks wrong with a crop, the farmer takes a photograph and sends it, and that photograph is the whole question: no symptom described, no crop named, often no text at all. The service has to determine whether the picture can be used, what crop it shows, and what is wrong with it, from images taken on cheap phones in a field, in poor light and with a moving camera. The system doing this today cannot be adjusted. It has no adjustable thresholds for photograph rejection, crops and problems cannot be added, and there is no confidence cut-off to set. We study about 1.16 million photographs sent to FarmerChat from Ethiopia, India, Kenya and Nigeria. The production quality gate rejected 46.8% of the images it judged, over a quarter of those reaching diagnosis returned no crop name, and 35.8% of the labelled problems filed under "disease" are pests, identifiable without the crop. We therefore split the work into three stages: a quality gate (M0), a crop detector (M1), and a disease or pest detector (M2). Route A fills all three with one fine-tuned vision-language model (Qwen3-VL-4B) answering in a single call. Route B fills each with a small specialist model (DaViT, YOLO26). We replace our production GPT-4o quality gate with a small MobileNetV3 gate at 86.9% F1 in 12 ms. On one test set scored the same way for every system, a hierarchical DaViT-Base achieves 95.41% crop accuracy against 91.46% for the production baseline. It also leads on diagnosis and never declines to answer, while every language model in the comparison leaves a large share of rows with no diagnosis. The fine-tuned model retains two capabilities the specialists do not have: one call for all three stages, and a request for a better photograph when the image cannot support an answer.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 9 of its 16 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 18 Sep 2026.

Builds on

9 of 16 references.

References · 9

  1. 2025Qwen3-VL Technical Reportcited by 2,793
  2. 2019Searching for MobileNetV3cited by 1,994
  3. 2025Gemma 3 Technical Reportcited by 1,824
  4. 2016Using Deep Learning for Image-Based Plant Disease Detectioncited by 219
  5. 2022DaViT: Dual Attention Vision Transformerscited by 175
  6. 2015An open access repository of images on plant health to enable the development of mobile disease diagnosticscited by 135
  7. 2019PlantDoc: A Dataset for Visual Plant Disease Detectioncited by 68
  8. 2024Farmer.Chat: Scaling AI-Powered Agricultural Services for Smallholder Farmerscited by 13
  9. 2026Benchmarking Automatic Speech Recognition for Indian Languages in Agricultural Contextscited by 2

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025Self-Consistency in Vision-Language Models for Precision Agriculture: Multi-Response Consensus for Crop Disease Management
  2. 2026Agri-CPJ: A Training-Free Explainable Framework for Agricultural Pest Diagnosis Using Caption-Prompt-Judge and LLM-as-a-Judge
  3. 2025CPJ: Explainable Agricultural Pest Diagnosis via Caption-Prompt-Judge with LLM-Judged Refinement
  4. 2025Agro-Consensus: Semantic Self-Consistency in Vision-Language Models for Crop Disease Management in Developing Countries
  5. 2026AgroGround: Multi-Granularity Grounded Recognition in Agriculture
  6. 2025AgriDoctor: A Multimodal Intelligent Assistant for Agriculture
  7. 2025A Multimodal Benchmark Dataset and Model for Crop Disease Diagnosis
  8. 2026AgriChain Visually Grounded Expert Verified Reasoning for Interpretable Agricultural Vision Language Models