Combining Object Detection with Geometry-Aware Clustering to Distinguish Overlapping Plants in UAV Imagery
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Reliable plant-level information from unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) imagery is important for automated crop monitoring. However, in dense crop canopies, adjacent plants frequently overlap and are detected as a single object, reducing the reliability of plant-level measurements. This study presents a geometry-aware post-detection framework for resolving overlapping plant instances using standard RGB UAV imagery. The framework combines object detection with geometric clustering of plant components. Leaves or branches detected within each bush-level region are represented using two complementary geometric features: component centroids and radial intersection points (RIPs) derived from detected plant structures. K-means and Gaussian mixture models determine whether a detected region contains a single plant or two overlapping plants. Density filtering suppresses spurious radial intersections, and a post-pipeline ensemble combines spatial and directional geometric information. The framework was evaluated using UAV imagery of eggplant and tomato crops under field conditions. Centroid-based clustering achieved an F1-score of 0.89 for eggplant, while the combined centroid-RIP approach achieved the best tomato performance, with an accuracy of 0.80, precision of 1.00, and F1-score of 0.75 using K-means. Density filtering substantially improved RIP-based clustering for tomato. The proposed approach provides a lightweight, modular engineering solution that can be integrated with existing RGB UAV monitoring pipelines without additional depth sensors, pixel-level segmentation, three-dimensional reconstruction, or retraining of the primary bush detector. The results demonstrate that geometric reasoning applied to existing detector outputs can complement deep-learning-based object detection and improve plant-level interpretation in dense agricultural canopies.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 2 of its 9 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 18 Sep 2026.
Builds on
2 of 9 references.
References · 2
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2022Development and evaluation of automated localisation and reconstruction of all fruits on tomato plants in a greenhouse based on multi-view perception and 3D multi-object tracking
- 20253D Reconstruction and Information Fusion between Dormant and Canopy Seasons in Commercial Orchards Using Deep Learning and Fast GICP
- 2024RowDetr: End-to-End Crop Row Detection Using Polynomials
- 2025Can Large Multimodal Models Understand Agricultural Scenes? Benchmarking with AgroMind
- 2024D4: Text-guided diffusion model-based domain adaptive data augmentation for vineyard shoot detection
- 2026From UAV Imagery to Agronomic Reasoning: A Multimodal LLM Benchmark for Plant Phenotyping
- 2025Zero-shot Hierarchical Plant Segmentation via Foundation Segmentation Models and Text-to-image Attention
- 2023TomatoDIFF: On-plant Tomato Segmentation with Denoising Diffusion Models