Uncertainty-driven training for three-dimensional calibrated lung nodule classification
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
In this work, we present an uncertainty-driven training framework for three-dimensional computed tomography (CT) lung nodule classification, where validation-based uncertainty estimates guide loss reweighting to enhance predictive performance and probability calibration. Two Uncertainty Quantification (UQ) methods are considered: Monte Carlo Dropout (MCD) and Evidential Deep Learning (EDL). Both provide per-class uncertainty estimates that modulate the loss and encourage focus on hard or unreliable classes. The framework is evaluated with ResNet, DenseNet, EfficientNet, Vision Transformer (ViT), and Swin Transformer backbones on two datasets: the clinical LIDC-IDRI cohort and the NoduleMNIST3D benchmark. Uncertainty-driven training achieves classification performance similar to conventional training while substantially improving calibration, with an expected calibration error (ECE) reduced by up to 65% on LIDC-IDRI. EDL attains competitive performance on shallower architectures with single-pass inference, whereas MCD is more robust on deeper networks. Analysis across architectural families reveals that uncertainty-driven training benefits convolutional backbones more consistently than transformer-based architectures: EDL in particular degrades on ViT, suggesting that the Dirichlet evidence parameterisation may interact unfavourably with attention-based architectures at lower input resolutions. A posteriori temperature scaling proves highly effective across all configurations, indicating that a simple scalar calibration can be competitive even without explicit uncertainty-aware training. Our results indicate that integrating UQ into the training loop can significantly improve probabilistic calibration and support more trustworthy deployment of three-dimensional medical imaging models.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 19 of its 32 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 17 Sep 2026.
Builds on
19 of 32 references.
References · 19
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
- 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 37,240
- 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 30,186
- 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,305
- 2021Swin Transformer: Hierarchical Vision Transformer using Shifted Windowscited by 12,139
- 2016Densely Connected Convolutional Networkscited by 6,720
- 2019EfficientNet: Rethinking Model Scaling for Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 6,442
- 2017On Calibration of Modern Neural Networkscited by 4,960
- 2015Dropout as a Bayesian Approximation: Representing Model Uncertainty in Deep Learningcited by 4,448
- 2016A Baseline for Detecting Misclassified and Out-of-Distribution Examples in Neural Networkscited by 2,385
- 2020A Review of Uncertainty Quantification in Deep Learning: Techniques, Applications and Challengescited by 819
- 2018Evidential Deep Learning to Quantify Classification Uncertaintycited by 732
7 more
- 2021MedMNIST v2 -- A large-scale lightweight benchmark for 2D and 3D biomedical image classificationcited by 690
- 2021A Survey of Uncertainty in Deep Neural Networkscited by 680
- 2019Uncertainty-aware Self-ensembling Model for Semi-supervised 3D Left Atrium Segmentationcited by 379
- 2021Soft Calibration Objectives for Neural Networkscited by 92
- 2024Revisiting Essential and Nonessential Settings of Evidential Deep Learningcited by 15
- 2021Uncertainty-Aware Deep Co-training for Semi-supervised Medical Image Segmentationcited by 12
- 2023Uncertainty Aware Training to Improve Deep Learning Model Calibration for Classification of Cardiac MR Imagescited by 7
Built on by
Not cited yet.