HEROIC: Heterogeneous Evidential Reasoning for Open-Vocabulary Identification and Cross-Robot Collaboration
On the map: LLM reasoning → Reasoning for agents, planning and code
Abstract (arXiv)
Multi-agent heterogeneous air-ground robot teams are attractive for open world search, with applications for reconnaissance, urban search and rescue missions (USAR), disaster response and recovery, and hazardous environments. These two platforms have different failure modes: aerial robots cover ground quickly but cannot resolve small or occluded targets from altitude, while ground robots can identify objects-of-interest, such as people or hazardous objects, at close range but cover less area. Existing language-tasked teams either have roles fixed prior, or have a language model assign them from hand-written capability tags, so the team is unable to know when within a mission an asset is no longer useful. We present HEROIC, a decentralized heterogeneous multi-agent open-vocabulary search coordination framework that requires agents to communicate in natural language only. HEROIC's initial agent role assignment is derived from sensor properties and a scale law to determine whether targets can be detected with a high confidence. From the mission's natural language prompt alone, this law assigns aerial flight altitudes and sweep spacing. When this calculated height falls below the altitude for safe flight, aerial agents re-task themselves from searcher to aerial triage, escort, and route guide for ground agents. Both robots maintain an evidential belief over the search area (bearing rays for positive evidence, a log-odds posterior for negative evidence) and gate any arrival on close-range verification. In full-stack experiments, HEROIC reaches the target 84% of the time across all 6 scenes, compares to 35-54% for vision-language frontier baselines, frontier-based search, lawnmower, and random-walk running the same perception, all while being 2-4x sooner to arrive at the target.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Reasoning for agents, planning and code, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 1 of its 22 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 17 Sep 2026.
Builds on
1 of 22 references.
References · 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025UAV-CodeAgents: Scalable UAV Mission Planning via Multi-Agent ReAct and Vision-Language Reasoning
- 2025General-Purpose Aerial Intelligent Agents Empowered by Large Language Models
- 2026AeroWeaver: An Embodied-Agent Harness for Weaving Aerial Skills into Distributed, Adaptive Swarm Execution
- 2026AgenticSwarm: Semantic Perception and Adaptive Task Allocation for Heterogeneous Multi-UAV Missions ↗
- 2026Structured World-State Reasoning for Agentic Robotic Search
- 2026AerialClaw: An Open-Source Framework for LLM-Driven Autonomous Aerial Agents
- 2026AURORA: A Natural Language-Driven Agentic Framework for Understanding, Reasoning, and Orchestrating Reliable Air-Ground Co-Simulation
- 2026CLOSER-VLN: Closed-Loop Self-Verified Retrieval-Augmented Reasoning for Aerial Vision-Language Navigation