mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Physics-Informed Hemodynamic Modeling for Data-Free Prediction and Sparse-Data Assimilation

arXiv 2609.19290 ↗First posted 16 Sep 2026eess.IV cs.AIcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Clinical decision-making for coronary intervention relies mainly on angiography and fractional flow reserve (FFR). However, angiography is two-dimensional and lacks depth information for 3D lesion characterization, while FFR provides only a single functional index, offering limited hemodynamic insight. Among existing methods, numerical analysis is computationally expensive, whereas learning-based approaches require extensive supervision and often lack physical consistency. To address these limitations, we propose physics-informed hemodynamic modeling, an integrated deep learning framework for 3D coronary blood flow analysis from dual-view angiography. First, an attention-enhanced CNN reconstructs coronary geometry from angiography. The resulting point clouds are then mapped to a reference domain and Fourier-encoded for joint representation. A decoupled network separately predicts velocity and pressure fields, with embedded physical priors enabling efficient transfer across physiological conditions. Across 32 clinical patients evaluated under four flow conditions, the trans-stenotic pressure-drop mean absolute percentage error was 2.02%, while the velocity and pressure relative-L2 errors were 0.054 and 0.023, respectively. Validation against hospital-measured FFR further achieved 93.8% diagnostic accuracy (30/32; exact 95% CI, 79.2%-99.2%). The framework also supports illustrative revascularization comparisons and sparse-data assimilation, with the full angiography-to-hemodynamics pipeline completed within 20 minutes per patient.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 16 Sep 2026.

Builds on

0 of 0 references.

No references here yet.

Built on by

Not cited yet.