mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Relationally Guided Use Case Modeling with LLMs

arXiv 2609.18291 ↗First posted 16 Sep 2026cs.SE cs.CLcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Use case flows are important elements of use case modeling because they support downstream software engineering activities, including requirements analysis, architectural and detailed design, and test case generation. However, constructing them manually is costly and expertise-intensive, while existing automated approaches still struggle to preserve semantic consistency, control-flow logic, data-flow logic, and the intended system boundary, especially when identifying branch points and generating alternative flows. To address this problem, we propose FlowGen for complete use case flow construction. FlowGen uses LLM-based Semantic Information Processing (SIP) to extract semantic elements, constructs a Semantic Relational Graph (SRG) encoded by an enhanced R-GAT for basic flow generation (BFGen), and further supports branch point prediction through BPP and branch-conditioned alternative flow generation through AFGen. Evaluations on 13 public and 7 industrial datasets show that FlowGen consistently outperforms competitive baselines in all three core components. In particular, BFGen improves over the best baseline by 14% in Precision, 7-25% in Recall, 11-30% in F1, and 10-19% in AUC; BPP improves Precision by 30-110%, Recall by 33-91%, and F1 by 32-117%; AFGen improves Precision by 8-23%, F1 by 5-18%, and AUC by 0.6-2.5%. Moreover, we validate the effectiveness of the LLM-based SIP module and the attention preservation factor in BFGen, analyze the impact of requirement completeness on BFGen, and examine how different scopes of branch-related context affect AFGen.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 12 of its 59 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 16 Sep 2026.

Builds on

12 of 59 references.

References · 12

  1. 2023Large Language Models on Graphs: A Comprehensive Surveycited by 192
  2. 2023A Survey of Graph Meets Large Language Model: Progress and Future Directionscited by 85
  3. 2022Self-Supervised Masking for Unsupervised Anomaly Detection and Localizationcited by 43
  4. 2025Unveiling Causal Reasoning in Large Language Models: Reality or Mirage?cited by 38
  5. 2024Using LLMs in Software Requirements Specifications: An Empirical Evaluationcited by 20
  6. 2022Towards using Few-Shot Prompt Learning for Automating Model Completioncited by 13
  7. 2023Large Language Models Based Automatic Synthesis of Software Specificationscited by 13
  8. 2024CaT-BENCH: Benchmarking Language Model Understanding of Causal and Temporal Dependencies in Planscited by 11
  9. 2024An Evaluation of Requirements Modeling for Cyber-Physical Systems via LLMscited by 7
  10. 2022Heterogeneous Graph Neural Networks for Software Effort Estimationcited by 3
  11. 2023RGAT: A Deeper Look into Syntactic Dependency Information for Coreference Resolutioncited by 3
  12. 2023TRIAD: Automated Traceability Recovery based on Biterm-enhanced Deduction of Transitive Links among Artifactscited by 3

Built on by

Not cited yet.