mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

BENCHCOMPASS: From Scores to Signals for Training and Harness Decisions in Payment-Domain LLMs

arXiv 2609.18270 ↗First posted 16 Sep 2026cs.AIcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Payment operations are a critical financial infrastructure, but the value of large language models in this domain remains unclear because payment rules change quickly, evidence is fragmented, and decisions depend on transaction state, participant role, region, and payment rail. Existing benchmarks do not isolate whether failures come from missing payment-rule knowledge, poor use of supplied evidence, or brittleness under imperfect harness inputs. We introduce BENCHCOMPASS, a payment-domain benchmark whose construction pipeline builds scenario-grounded tasks from typed evidence packs, applies LLM-based quality checks, creates task-input attack variants, and reserves final item admission for domain experts. The release contains an expert-reviewed Pro benchmark covering payment knowledge, context-grounded scenario reasoning, and Attacked Open robustness, plus a lower-assurance Normal pool for inspection and future curation. Across 16 model variants, BENCHCOMPASS shows qualitatively different failure modes: missing parametric payment knowledge, incomplete reasoning over supplied rules, and failure to reject plausible but invalid workflows. The benchmark remains unsaturated: the best frontier model reaches 89.6% on Open Context-Grounded Reasoning and 81.7% under attacked inputs, while a representative 32B open-weight model reaches 69.8% and 42.6%. Benchmark data and code are available at https://github.com/ant-intl/BenchCompass.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 29 of its 33 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 16 Sep 2026.

Builds on

29 of 33 references.

References · 29

  1. 2020Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP Taskscited by 9,160
  2. 2023Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arenacited by 8,393
  3. 2020Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understandingcited by 7,768
  4. 2023Lost in the Middle: How Language Models Use Long Contextscited by 3,383
  5. 2023GPQA: A Graduate-Level Google-Proof Q&A Benchmarkcited by 2,748
  6. 2023G-Eval: NLG Evaluation using GPT-4 with Better Human Alignmentcited by 2,205
  7. 2022Beyond the Imitation Game: Quantifying and extrapolating the capabilities of language modelscited by 1,970
  8. 2023Self-RAG: Learning to Retrieve, Generate, and Critique through Self-Reflectioncited by 1,800
  9. 2020Don't Stop Pretraining: Adapt Language Models to Domains and Taskscited by 1,548
  10. 2021FinQA: A Dataset of Numerical Reasoning over Financial Datacited by 552
  11. 2024From Crowdsourced Data to High-Quality Benchmarks: Arena-Hard and BenchBuilder Pipelinecited by 484
  12. 2021TAT-QA: A Question Answering Benchmark on a Hybrid of Tabular and Textual Content in Financecited by 402
17 more
  1. 2024LongBench v2: Towards Deeper Understanding and Reasoning on Realistic Long-context Multitaskscited by 367
  2. 2023Making Retrieval-Augmented Language Models Robust to Irrelevant Contextcited by 364
  3. 2023LegalBench: A Collaboratively Built Benchmark for Measuring Legal Reasoning in Large Language Modelscited by 328
  4. 2023RAGTruth: A Hallucination Corpus for Developing Trustworthy Retrieval-Augmented Language Modelscited by 272
  5. 2023FinanceBench: A New Benchmark for Financial Question Answeringcited by 261
  6. 2024LiveBench: A Challenging, Contamination-Limited LLM Benchmarkcited by 242
  7. 2022ConvFinQA: Exploring the Chain of Numerical Reasoning in Conversational Finance Question Answeringcited by 194
  8. 2023Benchmarking Foundation Models with Language-Model-as-an-Examinercited by 172
  9. 2023Why So Gullible? Enhancing the Robustness of Retrieval-Augmented Models against Counterfactual Noisecited by 52
  10. 2024Cheating Automatic LLM Benchmarks: Null Models Achieve High Win Ratescited by 42
  11. 2024AutoBencher: Towards Declarative Benchmark Constructioncited by 40
  12. 2024ECBD: Evidence-Centered Benchmark Design for NLPcited by 27
  13. 2024Is It Really Long Context if All You Need Is Retrieval? Towards Genuinely Difficult Long Context NLPcited by 27
  14. 2025When Judgment Becomes Noise: How Design Failures in LLM Judge Benchmarks Silently Undermine Validitycited by 11
  15. 2024Assessing "Implicit" Retrieval Robustness of Large Language Modelscited by 9
  16. 2024Toward Robust RALMs: Revealing the Impact of Imperfect Retrieval on Retrieval-Augmented Language Modelscited by 8
  17. 2025100-LongBench: Are de facto Long-Context Benchmarks Literally Evaluating Long-Context Ability?cited by 5

Built on by

Not cited yet.