Transformation Laws in Neural Representations: Structure, Realisability, and Construction
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
How neural representations preserve the structure of input changes connects representation analysis with internal intervention. We study operable representational content through compatible actions of reference transformations on neural features. We characterise when a transformation descends through an encoder, and give a linear setting in which the defect is governed by the transformation's demand for discarded information, measured in the metric the representation induces. On a rectifier the failure to realise a transformation has two distinguishable sources --- what the source region has already made unrecoverable, and what it costs to satisfy every region the transformation visits with one operator --- and for a textitmeasured harmonic carrier the same question has a closed answer: a linear realisation exists exactly when the retained harmonic blocks are invariant under the action. Using colour as the in-depth instance, we find that hue orbits in frozen visual features concentrate 84--88% of their energy in the first two harmonics with rotation planes shared across shapes, that this organisation is substantially inherited from input and architecture and is reshaped by training and depth, and that the measured structure supports prediction, transport from new starting states, and composition --- with global and local realisations differing sharply in which they achieve. Guided by the measurements, we construct a compact interface whose rotation action is fixed by the structure and never fitted: it reads hue zero-shot at 3.4^circ median error on unseen shapes. Theory, structural measurement, and construction together establish transformation laws as a concrete object connecting the understanding of neural representations to their design.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 25 of its 31 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 16 Sep 2026.
Builds on
25 of 31 references.
References · 25
- 2023DINOv2: Learning Robust Visual Features without Supervisioncited by 7,974
- 2016Group Equivariant Convolutional Networkscited by 1,165
- 2023The Linear Representation Hypothesis and the Geometry of Large Language Modelscited by 716
- 2017Deep learning for universal linear embeddings of nonlinear dynamicscited by 494
- 2019General E(2)-Equivariant Steerable CNNscited by 446
- 2018Towards a Definition of Disentangled Representationscited by 296
- 2014Understanding image representations by measuring their equivariance and equivalencecited by 243
- 2023Causal Abstraction: A Theoretical Foundation for Mechanistic Interpretabilitycited by 205
- 2021Inducing Causal Structure for Interpretable Neural Networkscited by 110
- 2021Equivariant Contrastive Learningcited by 66
- 2022The Lie Derivative for Measuring Learned Equivariancecited by 54
- 2024Does equivariance matter at scale?cited by 52
13 more
- 2021Learning Partial Equivariances from Datacited by 45
- 2025Taxonomy, Opportunities, and Challenges of Representation Engineering for Large Language Modelscited by 34
- 2023What Affects Learned Equivariance in Deep Image Recognition Models?cited by 15
- 2024A Characterization Theorem for Equivariant Networks with Point-wise Activationscited by 9
- 2026On the Non-Identifiability of Steering Vectors in Large Language Modelscited by 8
- 2023Color Equivariant Convolutional Networkscited by 7
- 2024Understanding the Role of Equivariance in Self-supervised Learningcited by 7
- 2026Steerable but Not Decodable: Function Vectors Operate Beyond the Logit Lenscited by 6
- 2024Learning Color Equivariant Representationscited by 5
- 2026Certified Interventional Fidelity: Anytime-Valid, Adaptive Evaluation of Causal Claims in Mechanistic Interpretabilitycited by 4
- 2026A Hypertoroidal Covering for Perfect Color Equivariancecited by 1
- 2026How Data Augmentation Shapes Neural Representationscited by 1
- 2026EditCLEVR: A Paired-Scene Intervention Benchmark for Compositional Faithfulness of Object-Centric Representationscited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.