mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Designing Agentic AI Workflow Portfolios under Imperfect Selection and Compute Cost

arXiv 2609.18126 ↗First posted 16 Sep 2026cs.AIcited by 1

On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Software engineering coding agents

Abstract (arXiv)

Agentic AI systems often approach the same task through multiple workflows that differ in reasoning strategy, verification structure, and compute cost. A natural deployment policy is to use the workflow with the highest average performance, but this can be suboptimal because different workflows may succeed on different instances. We study a portfolio-and-selector paradigm in which a firm runs multiple workflow executions and selects the final answer after observing their outputs. Additional executions may uncover correct answers that the best standalone workflow misses, but they consume compute and introduce plausible distractors that complicate final selection. We formulate this as a workflow portfolio problem in which the firm jointly chooses run size and allocation across workflow types. We summarize selector quality through an odds-lift index and derive sharp bounds on the value of workflow variety. For finite workflow pools, we develop exact formulations, linear programming relaxations, randomized rounding procedures, and computable performance certificates. For large implicit workflow classes, we derive a finite-dimensional dual and an ellipsoid method using a pricing oracle to identify workflows with high weighted accuracy net of recurring compute cost. Under a weak condition, the method obtains a near-optimal solution to the relaxation with polynomially many oracle calls. We evaluate the framework on three datasets: ABCD, Schema-Guided Dialogue, and HotpotQA. Relative to the best standalone workflow, portfolio optimization improves held-out selector accuracy by 3.1, 7.5, and 0.9 percentage points, respectively. Dual-guided workflow generation adds 3.5 points on ABCD and 24.1 on HotpotQA, with no additional gain on Schema-Guided Dialogue.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Software engineering coding agents, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 10 of its 70 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 16 Sep 2026.

Builds on

10 of 70 references.

Closest ancestors · 1

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2025AlphaEvolve: A coding agent for scientific and algorithmic discovery16 Jun

Other references · 9

  1. 2024RouterBench: A Benchmark for Multi-LLM Routing Systemcited by 238
  2. 2025Multi-agent Architecture Search via Agentic Supernetcited by 179
  3. 2021Action-Based Conversations Dataset: A Corpus for Building More In-Depth Task-Oriented Dialogue Systemscited by 75
  4. 2025Optimizing Model Selection for Compound AI Systemscited by 36
  5. 2026AI Agents for Inventory Control: Human-LLM-OR Complementaritycited by 8
  6. 2025A Training-free Method for LLM Text Attributioncited by 5
  7. 2025A General Framework for Estimating Preferences Using Response Time Datacited by 3
  8. 2026Asymptotically Optimal Sequential Testing with Heterogeneous LLMscited by 3
  9. 2026Multi-LLM Query Optimizationcited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026On Time, Within Budget: Constraint-Driven Online Resource Allocation for Agentic Workflows
  2. 2026Toward Reliable Design of LLM-Enabled Agentic Workflows: Optimizing Latency-Reliability-Cost Tradeoffs
  3. 2026FlowBank: Query-Adaptive Agentic Workflows Optimization through Precompute-and-Reuse
  4. 2026Agentomics: Economic Foundations for the Valuation, Attribution, and Pricing of AI Agents in Human-AI Workflows
  5. 2026MoFlow: Multi-Objective Agentic Workflow Generation
  6. 2025Understanding and Optimizing Agentic Workflows via Shapley value
  7. 2026EvoMAS: Learning Execution-Time Workflows for Multi-Agent Systems
  8. 2026It Takes Workflows to Evolve Better Workflows