GraphEcho: Structural Redundancy and Evidence Provenance in LLM Graph Agents
On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Agent threats, guardrails and governance
Abstract (arXiv)
A large language model (LLM) agent can follow more graph paths without acquiring more independent evidence. GraphEcho tests whether agents mistake these repeated encounters for additional corroboration. The benchmark varies path counts and evidential origins while holding evidence content fixed, and evaluates both judgments and active exploration. Controlled synthetic experiments reveal model-dependent judgment shifts, but redundant supporting paths increase the share of repeated walks across all evaluated frozen agents. Provenance-aware post-training (PAPT) reduces revisits and improves synthetic accuracy, yet covers fewer distinct sources. On scientific claims, it continues to reduce repetition while accuracy declines. These findings expose a gap between efficient exploration and effective evidence use: an agent can learn to stop repeating itself while overlooking information it needs. GraphEcho provides a controlled way to evaluate both what graph agents conclude and whether their exploration reaches distinct evidential sources.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Agent threats, guardrails and governance, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 13 of its 16 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 15 Sep 2026.
Builds on
13 of 16 references.
References · 13
- 2024DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Modelscited by 9,379
- 2022ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Modelscited by 8,695
- 2023Lost in the Middle: How Language Models Use Long Contextscited by 3,455
- 2023Self-RAG: Learning to Retrieve, Generate, and Critique through Self-Reflectioncited by 1,839
- 2022Interleaving Retrieval with Chain-of-Thought Reasoning for Knowledge-Intensive Multi-Step Questionscited by 923
- 2023Enabling Large Language Models to Generate Text with Citationscited by 595
- 2020Fact or Fiction: Verifying Scientific Claimscited by 554
- 2024Adaptive-RAG: Learning to Adapt Retrieval-Augmented Large Language Models through Question Complexitycited by 451
- 2023Making Retrieval-Augmented Language Models Robust to Irrelevant Contextcited by 369
- 2022Rich Knowledge Sources Bring Complex Knowledge Conflicts: Recalibrating Models to Reflect Conflicting Evidencecited by 144
- 2024Blinded by Generated Contexts: How Language Models Merge Generated and Retrieved Contexts When Knowledge Conflicts?cited by 48
- 2026How retriever redundancy and diversity impact RAG effectivenesscited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026From Agent Traces to Trust: A Survey of Evidence Tracing and Execution Provenance in LLM Agents
- 2026VeriGraph: Towards Verifiable Data-Analytic Agents
- 2026Building Trustworthy Graph-Agentic RAG for Social Good: Architectures, Failure Propagation, and Assurance by Construction
- 2026Stochastic Semantic Evidence Graphs: Uncertainty Propagation and Governance for Agentic AI
- 2026Think Locally, Explain Globally: Graph-Guided LLM Investigations via Local Reasoning and Belief Propagation
- 2026Minos: A Multi-Agent Collaborative Framework for Provenance-Based Backward Tracking
- 2026SearchAtlas: Analyzing Agentic Search Strategies via Evidential Query Graphs
- 2026Why Neighborhoods Matter: Traversal Context and Provenance in Agentic GraphRAG