mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Extracting ontology-compliant knowledge from scientific text describing irradiated materials using large language models

arXiv 2609.17291 ↗First posted 15 Sep 2026cs.AIcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The quest for new materials increasingly relies on predictive models and comprehensive simulations that span scales from atomic to macroscopic levels. However, essential data necessary for these models and simulations are often embedded in scientific literature as unstructured text, limiting reusability and posing challenges for researchers seeking to leverage existing knowledge effectively. While extracting structured data from unstructured text using large language models is gaining popularity, traditional methods typically generate key-value pairs data with straightforward schemas. In contrast, we introduce eolas, a modular pipeline that uses large language models to automatically transform scientific documents into knowledge graphs aligned with a specified ontology. We demonstrate eolas effectiveness in extracting useful information for scientists studying materials designed to endure the extreme temperatures and radiation levels found in fusion reactors. While a human expert might spend between thirty to ninety minutes extracting relevant data from an article, eolas can generate high-quality knowledge graphs in just a few minutes. These are presented in a tabular format with faceted navigation for easy human validation. Additionally, we introduce the first benchmark dataset designed to assess large language models capabilities in constructing knowledge graphs within the domain of irradiated materials. The analysis of 168 experiments using our dataset, various large language models and prompting techniques provides key insights that we summarize into practical guidelines for effectively extracting knowledge graphs aligned with an input ontology.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 15 of its 60 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 15 Sep 2026.

Builds on

15 of 60 references.

References · 15

  1. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,419
  2. 2023Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arenacited by 8,626
  3. 2023G-Eval: NLG Evaluation using GPT-4 with Better Human Alignmentcited by 2,276
  4. 2024From Local to Global: A Graph RAG Approach to Query-Focused Summarizationcited by 1,453
  5. 2023Can Large Language Models Be an Alternative to Human Evaluations?cited by 734
  6. 2024Graph Retrieval-Augmented Generation: A Surveycited by 324
  7. 2023LLMs for Knowledge Graph Construction and Reasoning: Recent Capabilities and Future Opportunitiescited by 97
  8. 2023Extracting Accurate Materials Data from Research Papers with Conversational Language Models and Prompt Engineeringcited by 86
  9. 2023Text2KGBench: A Benchmark for Ontology-Driven Knowledge Graph Generation from Textcited by 48
  10. 2024The Effectiveness of LLMs as Annotators: A Comparative Overview and Empirical Analysis of Direct Representationcited by 29
  11. 2023Exploring In-Context Learning Capabilities of Foundation Models for Generating Knowledge Graphs from Textcited by 19
  12. 2018Corpus Conversion Service: A Machine Learning Platform to Ingest Documents at Scalecited by 12
3 more
  1. 2024iText2KG: Incremental Knowledge Graphs Construction Using Large Language Modelscited by 11
  2. 2022Delivering Document Conversion as a Cloud Service with High Throughput and Responsivenesscited by 7
  3. 2024Automated, LLM enabled extraction of synthesis details for reticular materials from scientific literaturecited by 7

Built on by

Not cited yet.