Repurposing Unified Topological Signatures for Graph Representation Learning
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Message-passing Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) iteratively propagate and aggregate local neighborhood information followed by global readout to learn graph representations. However, their discriminative power is upper-bounded by the Weisfeiler--Lehman (1-WL) graph isomorphism test. This prevents GNNs from distinguishing certain non-isomorphic graphs with identical local neighborhood structures, often leading to similar graph representations. Unified Topological Signatures (UTS) capture compact, multi-scale representation of global graph topology derived from persistent homology. We introduce two complementary UTS signatures: Graph_UTS- a static signature of the input graph topology, and Embedding_UTS- a dynamic signature of the evolving embedding topology. They encode structural information inaccessible to 1-WL-based message-passing GNNs, yet their capabilities are explored solely for post-hoc embedding-space analysis. We integrate UTS into GNN training across three architectural interventions: (i) UTS-Aug: augmenting with standard readout feature that encodes graph's true topology; (ii) UTS-Reg: topological regularizer that constrains representation collapse; (iii) UTS-Pool: topology-guided pooling that retains structurally critical nodes. We further leverage UTS as a layer-wise diagnostic to quantify oversmoothing during GNN training. Theoretically, we show that integrating UTS into GNN optimization strictly extends GNN expressivity beyond the 1-WL hierarchy. Experiments on three graph classification benchmarks show consistent benefits: Graph-UTS, Dual-UTS, and UTS-Pool improve accuracy across all three datasets, Embedding-UTS provides smaller but similarly consistent gains, and UTS-Reg's benefit varies across graph domains. Accuracy improves by up to 5.8% with Graph-UTS augmentation, by up to 1.9% with UTS-Reg, and achieves comparable performance to TOGL with UTS-Pool.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 16 of its 24 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 15 Sep 2026.
Builds on
16 of 24 references.
References · 16
- 2017Inductive Representation Learning on Large Graphscited by 6,320
- 2018How Powerful are Graph Neural Networks?cited by 4,393
- 2013Sinkhorn Distances: Lightspeed Computation of Optimal Transportation Distancescited by 2,316
- 2020Open Graph Benchmark: Datasets for Machine Learning on Graphscited by 2,163
- 2018Deeper Insights into Graph Convolutional Networks for Semi-Supervised Learningcited by 1,102
- 2020TUDataset: A collection of benchmark datasets for learning with graphscited by 728
- 2019Self-Attention Graph Poolingcited by 421
- 2023A Survey on Oversmoothing in Graph Neural Networkscited by 247
- 2018Towards Sparse Hierarchical Graph Classifierscited by 100
- 2021Topological Graph Neural Networkscited by 87
- 2021Understanding Pooling in Graph Neural Networkscited by 69
- 2019Community Detection on Networks with Ricci Flowcited by 62
4 more
- 2024Graph Classification via Reference Distribution Learning: Theory and Practicecited by 11
- 2024Graph Pooling via Ricci Flowcited by 10
- 2023Topological Pooling on Graphscited by 9
- 2025From Topology to Retrieval: Decoding Embedding Spaces with Unified Signaturescited by 5
Built on by
Not cited yet.