mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Physics Informed Random Feature Neural Networks for Solving PDEs

arXiv 2609.16406 ↗First posted 14 Sep 2026math.NA cs.LG cs.NAcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Machine learning-based partial differential equations (PDEs) solvers have attracted significant attention in recent years. Most progress in this area has been driven by deep neural networks such as physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) and kernel method (such as physics-informed Gaussian Processes). We introduce a physics-informed random feature method for countering part of the spectral bias which PINN-based solvers are facing for a certain class of PDEs. Random feature method was originally proposed to approximate large-scale kernel machines and can be viewed as a specialized randomized neural network. Compared to other state-of-the-art PINN-based solvers which require a large number of collocation points, our proposed method reduces the computational complexity. In this paper, we develop a rigorous approximation error analysis and derive high-probability error bounds on the H1 norm. We provide extensive numerical tests for verifying our theoretical guarantees on error decay rates, as well as several comparison tests to showcase our claimed capability for combating spectral bias in these deep learning based methods.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 17 of its 46 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 14 Sep 2026.

Builds on

17 of 46 references.

References · 17

  1. 2021Characterizing possible failure modes in physics-informed neural networkscited by 643
  2. 2020When and why PINNs fail to train: A neural tangent kernel perspectivecited by 634
  3. 2021Solving and Learning Nonlinear PDEs with Gaussian Processescited by 129
  4. 2020Solving Allen-Cahn and Cahn-Hilliard Equations using the Adaptive Physics Informed Neural Networkscited by 123
  5. 2020Estimates on the generalization error of Physics Informed Neural Networks (PINNs) for approximating PDEscited by 116
  6. 2020Local Extreme Learning Machines and Domain Decomposition for Solving Linear and Nonlinear Partial Differential Equationscited by 81
  7. 2022Physics-Informed Gaussian Process Regression Generalizes Linear PDE Solverscited by 41
  8. 2023Sparse Cholesky Factorization for Solving Nonlinear PDEs via Gaussian Processescited by 31
  9. 2022Physics-Informed Neural Networks with Adaptive Localized Artificial Viscositycited by 22
  10. 2023Error Analysis of Kernel/GP Methods for Nonlinear and Parametric PDEscited by 21
  11. 2023An Extreme Learning Machine-Based Method for Computational PDEs in Higher Dimensionscited by 21
  12. 2024RandONet: Shallow-Networks with Random Projections for learning linear and nonlinear operatorscited by 16
5 more
  1. 2024Physics-informed kernel learningcited by 11
  2. 2024Solving Partial Differential Equations with Random Feature Modelscited by 6
  3. 2025Cauchy Random Features for Operator Learning in Sobolev Spacecited by 5
  4. 2022Parameter Inference based on Gaussian Processes Informed by Nonlinear Partial Differential Equationscited by 4
  5. 2025Physics-Informed Machine Learning in Biomedical Science and Engineeringcited by 4

Built on by

Not cited yet.