mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Optimal Pruning for Neural Architectures using Fisher Information Distances

arXiv 2609.16129 ↗First posted 14 Sep 2026cs.AI cs.IT math.DGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

A new scheme for parameter pruning is introduced, derived from the differential-geometric distance in model space. Pruning a parameter sets its value to zero, representing a displacement of the model to the hypersurface on which that parameter vanishes. The minimal distance from the unpruned model to this hypersurface is naturally computed via the geodesic distance in the model space as determined by the Fisher information metric. This distance determines the true change in the model, and its performance, under pruning. By analysing progressively more faithful approximations of this geodesic distance a natural hierarchy of optimality for pruning methods is determined. This starts with the traditional magnitude pruning, then develops into new more sophisticated and effective pruning schemes. The method is demonstrated for both fully-connected networks and vision transformers, on MNIST and CIFAR-10, over the complete 0-100% pruning range and across five random seeds. It outperforms pruning by parameter magnitude and by the local Fisher information alone in every architecture and dataset combination considered, on both accuracy and the Matthews correlation coefficient. Additionally, analysis of different levels of geodesic approximation produces intermediate pruning schemes that are computationally efficient and maintain near-optimal performance. This geometric picture supplies not only a state-of-the-art pruning methodology for AI models, but also a verified and mathematically-motivated justification for pruning schemes.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 23 of its 35 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 14 Sep 2026.

Builds on

23 of 35 references.

References · 23

  1. 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 29,915
  2. 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,160
  3. 2016Overcoming catastrophic forgetting in neural networkscited by 4,718
  4. 2015Deep Compression: Compressing Deep Neural Networks with Pruning, Trained Quantization and Huffman Codingcited by 2,291
  5. 2018The Lottery Ticket Hypothesis: Finding Sparse, Trainable Neural Networkscited by 2,250
  6. 2015Learning both Weights and Connections for Efficient Neural Networkscited by 1,998
  7. 2023SparseGPT: Massive Language Models Can Be Accurately Pruned in One-Shotcited by 1,090
  8. 2018SNIP: Single-shot Network Pruning based on Connection Sensitivitycited by 802
  9. 2015Optimizing Neural Networks with Kronecker-factored Approximate Curvaturecited by 776
  10. 2023A Simple and Effective Pruning Approach for Large Language Modelscited by 776
  11. 2020What is the State of Neural Network Pruning?cited by 578
  12. 2019Importance Estimation for Neural Network Pruningcited by 531
11 more
  1. 2020Pruning neural networks without any data by iteratively conserving synaptic flowcited by 475
  2. 2020Picking Winning Tickets Before Training by Preserving Gradient Flowcited by 467
  3. 2021Escaping the Big Data Paradigm with Compact Transformerscited by 261
  4. 2019Limitations of the Empirical Fisher Approximation for Natural Gradient Descentcited by 213
  5. 2018Faster gaze prediction with dense networks and Fisher pruningcited by 92
  6. 2023Bayesian Renormalizationcited by 13
  7. 2022The Inverse of Exact Renormalization Group Flows as Statistical Inferencecited by 11
  8. 2022On the Dynamics of Inference and Learningcited by 9
  9. 2024Bayesian RG Flow in Neural Network Field Theoriescited by 9
  10. 2024NCoder -- A Quantum Field Theory approach to encoding datacited by 7
  11. 2025Grokking vs. Learning: Same Features, Different Encodingscited by 2

Built on by

Not cited yet.