Graph Matching Relaxations and Amortization for Supervised Graph Prediction
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
End-to-end Supervised Graph Prediction (SGP) requires a permutation-invariant loss to compare predicted and target graphs with arbitrary node orderings. Such losses typically involve a costly graph-matching problem. We first study three Optimal Transport relaxations of this problem and show, theoretically and empirically, that the Gromov-Wasserstein (GW) objective is the most suitable for SGP. Then, to avoid solving the resulting inner optimization for every training example, we propose to amortize the graph matching (node alignment) problem. For each training sample, the loss function leverages a transport plan provided by a parametric matcher based on the differentiable Sinkhorn algorithm applied on empirical node distributions. The graph prediction module and the matcher are jointly learned. We showcase the efficiency of this approach on toy and real world SGP problems of increasing complexity including a novel Mass-spectra to Scaffold task that we introduce.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 22 of its 41 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 14 Sep 2026.
Builds on
22 of 41 references.
References · 22
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
- 2018How Powerful are Graph Neural Networks?cited by 4,393
- 2021SegFormer: Simple and Efficient Design for Semantic Segmentation with Transformerscited by 2,940
- 2013Sinkhorn Distances: Lightspeed Computation of Optimal Transportation Distancescited by 2,316
- 2020Open Graph Benchmark: Datasets for Machine Learning on Graphscited by 2,163
- 2017MoleculeNet: A Benchmark for Molecular Machine Learningcited by 1,051
- 2017Learning Generative Models with Sinkhorn Divergencescited by 314
- 2022Long Range Graph Benchmarkcited by 263
- 2018Optimal Transport for structured data with application on graphscited by 172
- 2019Scalable Gromov-Wasserstein Learning for Graph Partitioning and Matchingcited by 103
- 2022A Survey on Deep Graph Generation: Methods and Applicationscited by 69
- 2022Relationformer: A Unified Framework for Image-to-Graph Generationcited by 67
10 more
- 2021Linear-Time Gromov Wasserstein Distances using Low Rank Couplings and Costscited by 61
- 2024The Elements of Differentiable Programmingcited by 43
- 2024MassSpecGym: A benchmark for the discovery and identification of moleculescited by 38
- 2022Learning to Predict Graphs with Fused Gromov-Wasserstein Barycenterscited by 22
- 2025Improving Equivariant Networks with Probabilistic Symmetry Breakingcited by 16
- 2025The quest for the GRAph Level autoEncoder (GRALE)cited by 8
- 2024Any2Graph: Deep End-To-End Supervised Graph Prediction With An Optimal Transport Losscited by 7
- 2025Unsupervised Learning for Optimal Transport plan prediction between unbalanced graphscited by 3
- 2026Conformal Graph Prediction with Z-Gromov-Wasserstein Distancescited by 2
- 2026MSAlign: Aligning Molecule and Mass Spectra representations for Metabolite Identificationcited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.