Structured Features Overfit Where Random Features Grok
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Xu, Vardi and Safran (ICML 2026) prove that over-parameterized ridge regression over an unstructured random Gaussian feature map groks, with the delay between memorization and generalization growing as 1/λ in the weight decay. We show that on a structured feature map the same delay does not appear. For a band-limited Fourier feature map over mathbbZp2 carrying a single-character target that lies inside the expressible class, enlarging the band at fixed positive weight decay drives peak held-out accuracy monotonically from 1.00 to 0.07, with no memorize-then-generalize regime anywhere along the sweep. The degradation is not an interpolation effect. It sets in at capacity ratio q/n = 0.638, far below the interpolation threshold, on separate grounds from the exact null space that appears above it. What does have a sharp boundary is the active support. Holding the nominal dimension fixed and masking the band back to 1089 active modes restores held-out accuracy of 1.000 with zero variance across seeds, while the full 4225-mode band collapses to 0.185. The number of active modes acts through the teacher-weighted spectrum of the empirical Gram matrix and not through the capacity ratio, which makes this a statement about feature geometry and not a restatement of double descent.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 9 of its 9 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 14 Sep 2026.
Builds on
9 of 9 references.
References · 9
- 2023Progress measures for grokking via mechanistic interpretabilitycited by 839
- 2022Grokking: Generalization Beyond Overfitting on Small Algorithmic Datasetscited by 629
- 2015An Introduction to Matrix Concentration Inequalitiescited by 397
- 2022Towards Understanding Grokking: An Effective Theory of Representation Learningcited by 230
- 2023Grokking as the Transition from Lazy to Rich Training Dynamicscited by 108
- 2024Why Do You Grok? A Theoretical Analysis of Grokking Modular Additioncited by 36
- 2023Grokking in Linear Estimators -- A Solvable Model that Groks without Understandingcited by 25
- 2024Grokking Modular Polynomialscited by 18
- 2026Algebraic Representability as the Limiting Regime of Grokking: An Exactly Solvable Model with Holomorphic Activationscited by 2
Built on by
Not cited yet.