mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Linearized PINN with pretrained nonlinear layers

arXiv 2609.14926 ↗First posted 14 Sep 2026math.AP cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We propose a linearized Physics-Informed Neural Network (lPINN), a reduced-order neural basis method for forward and inverse differential equations. In an offline stage, lPINN learns operator-compatible continuous neural basis functions from an ensemble of numerical solutions. The basis functions are differentiable through automatic differentiation and are pretrained using solution data together with either derivative information or physics residuals. For each new problem instance, the basis functions are frozen and the solution is obtained by minimizing the governing-equation residual together with applicable initial, boundary, regularization, and observational terms. Unlike surrogate and operator-learning methods, the training data define the trial space offline, while the instance-specific solution is computed online by enforcing the governing physics. Relative to vanilla PINNs, lPINN pretrains the nonlinear hidden-layer representation offline and performs online inference only in the final linear layer. We evaluate lPINN on forward and inverse problems for the advection-diffusion equation, Burgers' equation, and the nonlinear pendulum equation. Compared with vanilla PINNs, lPINN achieves lower solution and parameter errors while reducing online inference times by approximately one to more than three orders of magnitude, with the largest gains generally observed for limited residual or measurement data. Cross-resolution experiments show that the learned continuous representation can be evaluated on finer meshes without retraining and with nearly unchanged accuracy.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 16 of its 29 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 14 Sep 2026.

Builds on

16 of 29 references.

References · 16

  1. 2020Fourier Neural Operator for Parametric Partial Differential Equationscited by 2,908
  2. 2020Fourier Features Let Networks Learn High Frequency Functions in Low Dimensional Domainscited by 2,200
  3. 2019DeepONet: Learning nonlinear operators for identifying differential equations based on the universal approximation theorem of operatorscited by 2,018
  4. 2021Characterizing possible failure modes in physics-informed neural networkscited by 643
  5. 2020When and why PINNs fail to train: A neural tangent kernel perspectivecited by 634
  6. 2021Learning the solution operator of parametric partial differential equations with physics-informed DeepOnetscited by 540
  7. 2021Neural Fields in Visual Computing and Beyondcited by 540
  8. 2021Physics-Informed Neural Operator for Learning Partial Differential Equationscited by 527
  9. 2020On the eigenvector bias of Fourier feature networks: From regression to solving multi-scale PDEs with physics-informed neural networkscited by 284
  10. 2019Physics Informed Extreme Learning Machine (PIELM) -- A rapid method for the numerical solution of partial differential equationscited by 67
  11. 2022CROM: Continuous Reduced-Order Modeling of PDEs Using Implicit Neural Representationscited by 58
  12. 2021One-Shot Transfer Learning of Physics-Informed Neural Networkscited by 49
4 more
  1. 2024Unveiling the optimization process of Physics Informed Neural Networks: How accurate and competitive can PINNs be?cited by 31
  2. 2022Bayesian Physics-Informed Extreme Learning Machine for Forward and Inverse PDE Problems with Noisy Datacited by 12
  3. 2019A comparative study of physics-informed neural network models for learning unknown dynamics and constitutive relationscited by 9
  4. 2024Physics-informed reduced order model with conditional neural fieldscited by 4

Built on by

Not cited yet.