Domain Generalization for Smartphone-Based Human Activity Recognition: A Systematic Analysis of Components and Interactions
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Smartphone-based Human Activity Recognition (HAR) models often degrade under distribution shifts caused by changes in users, devices, sensor placements, environments, and acquisition protocols. Domain Generalization (DG) addresses this problem by learning from source domains without access to target data. Existing DG methods span training objectives, representation initialization, and architectural modifications, but these components are typically evaluated in isolation despite operating at different stages of the learning pipeline. We present a large-scale controlled benchmark of DG for smartphone-based HAR, comprising more than 410,000 experiments across four model architectures, thirteen training objectives including Empirical Risk Minimization (ERM), five initialization strategies, four architectural configurations, and two shift scenarios: cross-dataset and cross-position. Results show that individual DG components provide limited and highly conditional gains. Alternative objectives rarely outperform ERM consistently, self-supervised initialization helps in specific settings, and architectural modifications, particularly Dynamic Domain Generalization, provide the clearest standalone improvements. Joint configurations, however, frequently outperform their individual components and exhibit complementary and sometimes super-additive interactions, although gains remain model- and shift-dependent. Class-level analysis shows that the strongest configurations mainly improve difficult, shift-sensitive decision boundaries. Finally, oracle checkpoint analysis reveals substantial unrealized performance: source-validation selection recovers only 53% and 26% of the available oracle gain in cross-dataset and cross-position settings, respectively. Overall, effective HAR domain generalization requires jointly designing DG components and robust model-selection strategies.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 27 of its 50 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 14 Sep 2026.
Builds on
27 of 50 references.
References · 27
- 2019Distributionally Robust Neural Networks for Group Shifts: On the Importance of Regularization for Worst-Case Generalizationcited by 1,247
- 2016Deep CORAL: Correlation Alignment for Deep Domain Adaptationcited by 1,200
- 2020In Search of Lost Domain Generalizationcited by 1,054
- 2021Generalizing to Unseen Domains: A Survey on Domain Generalizationcited by 766
- 2020Out-of-Distribution Generalization via Risk Extrapolation (REx)cited by 742
- 2021Domain Generalization with MixStylecited by 566
- 2021TS2Vec: Towards Universal Representation of Time Seriescited by 471
- 2020Self-Challenging Improves Cross-Domain Generalizationcited by 426
- 2021Gradient Matching for Domain Generalizationcited by 258
- 2022Self-Supervised Contrastive Pre-Training For Time Series via Time-Frequency Consistencycited by 250
- 2021Fishr: Invariant Gradient Variances for Out-of-Distribution Generalizationcited by 186
- 2022Exact Feature Distribution Matching for Arbitrary Style Transfer and Domain Generalizationcited by 122
15 more
- 2018Mobile Sensor Data Anonymizationcited by 70
- 2016Recognizing Detailed Human Context In-the-Wild from Smartphones and Smartwatchescited by 42
- 2022Domain-invariant Feature Exploration for Domain Generalizationcited by 34
- 2022Semantic-Discriminative Mixup for Generalizable Sensor-based Cross-domain Activity Recognitioncited by 29
- 2023Domain Generalization in Computational Pathology: Survey and Guidelinescited by 29
- 2022Domain generalization of 3D semantic segmentation in autonomous drivingcited by 25
- 2023ERM++: An Improved Baseline for Domain Generalizationcited by 18
- 2023Self-supervised Representation Learning From Random Data Projectorscited by 15
- 2023Domain Generalisation via Risk Distribution Matchingcited by 14
- 2022Dynamic Domain Generalizationcited by 9
- 2024Is Large-Scale Pretraining the Secret to Good Domain Generalization?cited by 9
- 2022FIXED: Frustratingly Easy Domain Generalization with Mixupcited by 6
- 2025Towards Generalizable Human Activity Recognition: A Surveycited by 6
- 2025HAROOD: A Benchmark for Out-of-distribution Generalization in Sensor-based Human Activity Recognitioncited by 3
- 2025Why Domain Generalization Fail? A View of Necessity and Sufficiencycited by 2
Built on by
Not cited yet.