mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Tone on a Budget: A Reference-Free Metric for Lexical Tone in Massively Multilingual Text-to-Speech

arXiv 2609.14817 ↗First posted 13 Sep 2026cs.CLcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

In Yor`ub'a, pitch alone separates dokdo (husband, Mid), dokd`o (vehicle, Low), and dokd'o (hoe, High) -- the diacritics ARE the tone marks. Yet character error rate (CER), the standard automated metric for text-to-speech (TTS), is in practice computed from ASR output that drops those marks: a synthesizer can ace CER and still say vehicle for husband. We introduce DunDun -- named for the d`und'un, the Yor`ub'a talking drum that speaks through pitch alone -- an automated, reference-free lexical-tone metric that needs no tone-labelled corpus. The gold High/Mid/Low sequence is read from the input text's diacritics (in TTS that text exists by construction, so no reference recording is needed); the prediction comes from the audio's pitch track. We validate three ways. Flattening pitch with PSOLA resynthesis collapses DunDun while CER does not move. Inverting High and Low in the answer key of 300 native recordings drives the two-class readout to 0.14, symmetrically below its 0.35 chance level -- a consistency check on the scoring path, not independent evidence. And three native listeners, over 67 blind A/B trials, pick the tone-correct clip 89.6% of the time (95% CI 80.0-94.8; p < 1e-4); whether DunDun tracks those judgements trial by trial is not resolved at this sample size. Applied to a massively multilingual zero-shot TTS model, DunDun shows what CER cannot: Yor`ub'a tone sits near the native anchor before any Yor`ub'a fine-tuning (0.567 +/- 0.02 over five decode seeds vs. 0.596; chance 0.33), despite the 21.4% CER the model's own paper reports; and a few hours of clean audio halve CER (5.6% to 2.7% by 5h, 1.7% by 15h) while tone saturates within the hour. On non-tonal Swahili, CER already captures the gains: the metric a language needs is language-dependent. We release the metric and the complete validation protocol.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 12 of its 29 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 13 Sep 2026.

Builds on

12 of 29 references.

References · 12

  1. 2022Robust Speech Recognition via Large-Scale Weak Supervisioncited by 4,057
  2. 2023Scaling Speech Technology to 1,000+ Languagescited by 411
  3. 2022BibleTTS: a large, high-fidelity, multilingual, and uniquely African speech corpuscited by 32
  4. 2025EmergentTTS-Eval: Evaluating TTS Models on Complex Prosodic, Expressiveness, and Linguistic Challenges Using Model-as-a-Judgecited by 24
  5. 2026Prosodic ABX: A Language-Agnostic Method for Measuring Prosodic Contrast in Speech Representationscited by 3
  6. 2025Objective Evaluation of Prosody and Intelligibility in Speech Synthesis via Conditional Prediction of Discrete Tokenscited by 2
  7. 2026Linguistically Informed Evaluation of Multilingual ASR for African Languagescited by 2
  8. 2025LTA-L2S: Lexical Tone-Aware Lip-to-Speech Synthesis for Mandarin with Cross-Lingual Transfer Learningcited by 1
  9. 2025Vox-Evaluator: Enhancing Stability and Fidelity for Zero-shot TTS with A Multi-Level Evaluatorcited by 1
  10. 2026Towards Prosodically Informed Mizo TTS without Explicit Tone Markingscited by 1
  11. 2026Lexical Tone is Hard to Quantize: Probing Discrete Speech Units in Mandarin and Yor`ub'acited by 1
  12. 2026Towards Digital Preservation of Efik: TTS for a Low-Resource African Languagecited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.